Bacalbasa Nicolae, Balescu Irina, Dima Simona, Brasoveanu Vladislav, Popescu Irinel
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Ponderas Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5097-101.
To determine the impact of survival of peritoneal versus splenic metastasis in cases submitted to splenectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Between January 2002 and May 2014, 28 patients were submitted to splenectomy as part of secondary, tertiary and beyond tertiary cytoreduction at the Dan Setlacec Center of Gastrointestinal Disease and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest.
Splenectomy was performed as follows: at secondary cytoreduction in 21 cases, at tertiary cytoreduction in six cases, and beyond tertiary cytoreduction in one case. An R0 resection was attempted in all cases; however, in two cases submitted to splenectomy as part of tertiary cytoreduction, R1 and R2 resection, were performed, respectively. Histopathological studies revealed the presence of peritoneal seeding in 11 cases at secondary cytoreduction and in four cases submitted to splenectomy as part of tertiary cytoreduction. Parenchymatous lesions were described in nine cases submitted to splenectomy as part of secondary cytoreduction and in two cases at tertiary cytoreduction. In a single case in which splenectomy was performed in the context of secondary cytoreduction, hilar involvement was found. Peritoneal seeding was described in the patient for whom splenectomy was performed at quaternary cytoreduction. Early postoperative mortality for the entire cohort (within 30 days) was 7.1% (death occurred in two cases submitted to splenectomy during the secondary cytoreduction). The median overall survival in patients with splenic involvement via peritoneal route was 35 months, while in cases with hematogenous splenic lesions, it was 12 months (p=0.2) at secondary cytoreduction. In the sub-group of patients submitted to splenectomy as part of tertiary cytoreduction, the median overall survival in patients with splenic involvement via peritoneal route was 21 months, while in cases with hematogenous splenic lesions it was 4 months (p=0.08). The patient submitted to quaternary cytoreduction died of disease 20 months later.
splenectomy as part of secondary, tertiary and quaternary cytoreduction can be performed safely, with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. The maximal survival benefit seems to be obtained for patients with splenic involvement via peritoneal route, while those with hematogenous spread live a shorter period; further study is required in order to assess if resection in such cases is preferable to palliative chemotherapy. Maximal survival benefit occurs in the setting of secondary cytoreduction, although in selected cases, even quaternary cytoreduction can be followed by long-term survival.
确定在复发性上皮性卵巢癌的肿瘤细胞减灭术中,行脾切除术时腹膜转移与脾转移对生存的影响。
2002年1月至2014年5月期间,28例患者在布加勒斯特Fundeni临床研究所Dan Setlacec胃肠病与肝移植中心接受了脾切除术,作为二级、三级及超三级肿瘤细胞减灭术的一部分。
脾切除术的实施情况如下:二级肿瘤细胞减灭术时进行21例,三级肿瘤细胞减灭术时进行6例,超三级肿瘤细胞减灭术时进行1例。所有病例均尝试进行R0切除;然而,在作为三级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分而接受脾切除术的2例患者中,分别进行了R1和R2切除。组织病理学研究显示,二级肿瘤细胞减灭术时有11例存在腹膜种植,作为三级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分接受脾切除术的有4例。作为二级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分接受脾切除术的9例及三级肿瘤细胞减灭术时的2例有实质病变。在作为二级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分进行脾切除术的1例患者中发现肝门受累。在四级肿瘤细胞减灭术时接受脾切除术的患者有腹膜种植。整个队列的术后早期死亡率(30天内)为7.1%(2例在二级肿瘤细胞减灭术期间接受脾切除术的患者死亡)。二级肿瘤细胞减灭术时,经腹膜途径累及脾脏的患者中位总生存期为35个月,而血行性脾病变患者为12个月(p=0.2)。在作为三级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分接受脾切除术的患者亚组中,经腹膜途径累及脾脏的患者中位总生存期为21个月,而血行性脾病变患者为4个月(p=0.08)。接受四级肿瘤细胞减灭术的患者20个月后死于疾病。
作为二级、三级和四级肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分的脾切除术可安全实施,发病率和死亡率在可接受范围内。经腹膜途径累及脾脏的患者似乎能获得最大生存益处,而血行播散患者生存期较短;需要进一步研究以评估此类病例中切除是否优于姑息化疗。最大生存益处出现在二级肿瘤细胞减灭术时,尽管在某些特定病例中,即使是四级肿瘤细胞减灭术后也可实现长期生存。