Rasekaba Tshepo M, Furler John, Blackberry Irene, Tacey Mark, Gray Kathleen, Lim Kwang
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Northern Clinical Research Centre, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, Australia.
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;110(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
To evaluate the effect of telemedicine on GDM service and maternal, and foetal outcomes.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of telemedicine interventions for GDM was conducted. We searched English publications from 01/01/1990 to 31/08/2013, with further new publication tracking to June 2015 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry electronic databases. Findings are presented as standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) or narrative and quantitative description of findings where meta-analysis was not possible.
Our search yielded 721 abstracts. Four met the inclusion criteria; two publications arose from the same study, resulting in three studies for review. All studies compared telemedicine to usual care. Telemedicine was associated with significantly fewer unscheduled GDM clinic visits, SMD. Quality of life, glycaemic control (HbA1c, pre and postprandial blood glucose level (BGL)), and caesarean section rate were similar between the telemedicine and usual care groups. None of the studies evaluated costs.
Telemedicine has the potential to streamline GDM service utilisation without compromising maternal and foetal outcomes. Its advantage may lie in the convenience of reducing face-to-face and unscheduled consultations. Studies are limited and more trials that include cost evaluation are required.
评估远程医疗对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)服务以及母婴结局的影响。
对GDM远程医疗干预的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了1990年1月1日至2013年8月31日期间的英文出版物,并在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PUBMED、CINAHL、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册电子数据库中进一步追踪到2015年6月的新出版物。研究结果以标准化均数差(SMD)和比值比(OR)表示,或者在无法进行荟萃分析时以研究结果的叙述性和定量描述表示。
我们的检索得到721篇摘要。四项符合纳入标准;两项出版物来自同一研究,因此共有三项研究可供审查。所有研究均将远程医疗与常规护理进行比较。远程医疗与计划外GDM门诊就诊显著减少相关,标准化均数差。远程医疗组和常规护理组在生活质量、血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白、餐前和餐后血糖水平(BGL))以及剖宫产率方面相似。没有一项研究评估成本。
远程医疗有可能简化GDM服务的利用,而不影响母婴结局。其优势可能在于减少面对面和计划外咨询的便利性。研究有限,需要更多包括成本评估的试验。