Suppr超能文献

用于超高场人体成像的偶极天线:与环形线圈的比较。

Dipole antennas for ultrahigh-field body imaging: a comparison with loop coils.

作者信息

Raaijmakers A J E, Luijten P R, van den Berg C A T

机构信息

UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

NMR Biomed. 2016 Sep;29(9):1122-30. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3356. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

Abstract

Although the potential of dipole antennas for ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI is largely recognized, they are still relatively unknown to the larger part of the MRI community. This article intends to provide electromagnetic insight into the general operating principles of dipole antennas by numerical simulations. The major part focuses on a comparison study of dipole antennas and loop coils at frequencies of 128, 298 and 400 MHz. This study shows that dipole antennas are only efficient radiofrequency (RF) coils in the presence of a dielectric and/or conducting load. In addition, the conservative electric fields (E-fields) at the ends of a dipole are negligible in comparison with the induced E-fields in the center. Like loop coils, long dipole antennas perform better than short dipoles for deeply located imaging targets and vice versa. When the optimal element is chosen for each depth, loop coils have higher B1 (+) efficiency for shallow depths, whereas dipole antennas have higher B1 (+) efficiency for large depths. The cross-over point depth decreases with increasing frequency: 11.6, 6.2 and 5.0 cm for 128, 298 and 400 MHz, respectively. For single elements, loop coils demonstrate a better B1 (+) /√SARmax ratio for any target depth and any frequency. However, one example study shows that, in an array setup with loop coil overlap for decoupling, this relationship is not straightforward. The overlapping loop coils may generate increased specific absorption rate (SAR) levels under the overlapping parts of the loops, depending on the drive phase settings. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

尽管偶极天线在超高场(UHF)磁共振成像(MRI)中的潜力已得到广泛认可,但MRI领域的大部分人对其仍相对陌生。本文旨在通过数值模拟,从电磁学角度深入了解偶极天线的一般工作原理。主要部分聚焦于在128、298和400 MHz频率下对偶极天线和环形线圈的比较研究。该研究表明,偶极天线仅在存在电介质和/或导电负载时才是高效的射频(RF)线圈。此外,与中心处的感应电场相比,偶极天线两端的保守电场可忽略不计。与环形线圈一样,对于深部成像目标,长偶极天线比短偶极天线表现更好,反之亦然。当为每个深度选择最佳元件时,对于浅深度,环形线圈具有更高的B1(+)效率,而对于大深度,偶极天线具有更高的B1(+)效率。交叉点深度随频率增加而减小:128、298和400 MHz时分别为11.6、6.2和5.0 cm。对于单个元件,在任何目标深度和任何频率下,环形线圈都表现出更好的B1(+)/√SARmax比值。然而,一项实例研究表明,在用于去耦的环形线圈重叠的阵列设置中,这种关系并不简单。根据驱动相位设置,重叠的环形线圈可能会在环路重叠部分下方产生更高的比吸收率(SAR)水平。版权所有© 2015约翰威立父子有限公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验