Klodell Charles T, Massey H Todd, Adamson Robert M, Dean David A, Horstmanshof Douglas A, Ransom John M, Salerno Christopher T, Cowger Jennifer A, Aranda Juan M, Chen Leway, Long James W, Dembitsky Walter
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
J Card Surg. 2015 Oct;30(10):775-80. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12607. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
Recent reports suggested that HeartMate II (HMII) thrombosis rates may be higher in implants after 2011. We characterize events at HMII centers (>100 HMII implants) whose device thrombosis rates are equivalent or lower than reported by INTERMACS.
Seven centers pooled implants from 2011 through June 2013 to examine pump thrombus and identify characteristics and clinical strategies that potentially mitigate the risk. A total of 666 patients (age 59 ± 13 years; 81% male) were studied (support duration: 13.7 ± 8.3 months, cumulative: 759 patient years). Median target INR was 2.25 (range 2.0 to 2.5), and median pump speed was 9200 rpm (range 8600 to 9600). Pump thrombus was suspected with clinical evidence (e.g., hemolysis, positive ramp test) requiring intervention (e.g., anticoagulation therapy, pump exchange) or patient death.
Suspected pump thrombus occurred in 24/666 (3.6%) patients within three months of implant. At six months, 38/666 (5.7%) had suspected pump thrombus including 24 (3.6%) resulting in pump exchange or death. Stroke (hemorrhagic: 0.049, and ischemic: 0.048 events/patient year) and survival (six months: 88 ± 1%; 1 year: 81 ± 2%) were consistent with national averages. Suspected pump thrombus patients were younger (55 ± 13 vs. 59 ± 13, p = 0.046) and had more females (31.6% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.054). There was no difference in indication, etiology of heart failure, or body size.
This analysis demonstrates low HMII thrombus events. Minimization of risk factors by uniform implant techniques and consistent post-op management may reduce device thrombosis. A larger scale multicenter evaluation may better elucidate the difference in thrombus events between centers.
最近的报告表明,2011年后植入的HeartMate II(HMII)血栓形成率可能更高。我们对HMII中心(植入超过100例HMII)的事件进行了特征描述,这些中心的设备血栓形成率等于或低于INTERMACS报告的水平。
七个中心汇总了2011年至2013年6月期间的植入病例,以检查泵血栓,并确定可能降低风险的特征和临床策略。共研究了666例患者(年龄59±13岁;81%为男性)(支持时间:13.7±8.3个月,累计:759患者年)。目标INR中位数为2.25(范围2.0至2.5),泵速中位数为9200转/分钟(范围8600至9600)。根据需要干预(如抗凝治疗、泵更换)或患者死亡的临床证据(如溶血、斜坡试验阳性)怀疑有泵血栓。
24/666(3.6%)例患者在植入后三个月内怀疑发生泵血栓。六个月时,38/666(5.7%)例怀疑有泵血栓,其中24例(3.6%)导致泵更换或死亡。中风(出血性:0.049,缺血性:0.048事件/患者年)和生存率(六个月:88±1%;一年:81±2%)与全国平均水平一致。怀疑有泵血栓的患者更年轻(55±13岁对59±13岁,p=0.046),女性更多(分别为31.6%和18.3%,p=0.054)。在植入指征、心力衰竭病因或体型方面没有差异。
该分析表明HMII血栓事件发生率较低。通过统一的植入技术和一致的术后管理将风险因素降至最低可能会减少设备血栓形成。更大规模的多中心评估可能会更好地阐明各中心之间血栓事件的差异。