Kanoto Masafumi, Sugai Yukio, Hosoya Takaaki, Toyoguchi Yuuki, Konno Yoshihiro, Watarai Fumika, Ito Tsukasa, Watanabe Tomoo, Kakehata Seiji
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Iida-Nishi 2-2-2, 990-9585 Yamagata, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Iida-Nishi 2-2-2, 990-9585 Yamagata, Japan.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;33(10):1253-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
Cholesteatomas show high intensity in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We performed fused thin slice non-echo planar imaging (EPI) DWI and magnetic resonance cisternography (FTS-nEPID) for cholesteatoma patients to increase the detectability of FTS-nEPID for cholesteatoma. The subjects are 77 consecutive patients who underwent FTS-nEPID as a preoperative study (mean age: 53.3±21.8, 47 men and 30 women). Otorhinolaryngologists performed the operations. We anatomically classified the middle ear into four portions. A radiologist evaluated the images for cholesteatoma and assessed the anatomical invasive range in four portions using only FTS-nEPID. We classified large cholesteatomas that invaded more than three portions and small ones that invaded less than two portions based on the results obtained from surgery, and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). For all cholesteatomas with an existing diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 71%, 70%, 94%, and 27%, respectively. In anatomical evaluation, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 49%, 85%, 77%, and 64%, respectively. For large cholesteatomas with an existing diagnosis, the sensitivity was 86%. In anatomical evaluation, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 51%, 57%, 88%, and 18%, respectively. For small cholesteatomas with an existing diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 59%, 78%, 92%, and 30%, respectively. In anatomical evaluation, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 40%, 85%, 60%, and 71%, respectively. FTS-nEPID may be useful for diagnosing cholesteatomas. Further research is needed for anatomical evaluation because there were many false-negative results.
胆脂瘤在扩散加权成像(DWI)中表现为高信号强度。我们对胆脂瘤患者进行了融合薄层非回波平面成像(EPI)DWI和磁共振脑池造影(FTS-nEPID),以提高FTS-nEPID对胆脂瘤的检测能力。研究对象为77例连续接受FTS-nEPID作为术前检查的患者(平均年龄:53.3±21.8岁,男性47例,女性30例)。手术由耳鼻喉科医生进行。我们将中耳在解剖学上分为四个部分。一名放射科医生仅使用FTS-nEPID评估胆脂瘤图像,并评估四个部分的解剖学侵袭范围。我们根据手术结果将侵袭超过三个部分的大胆脂瘤和侵袭少于两个部分的小胆脂瘤进行分类,并计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。对于所有已确诊的胆脂瘤,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为71%、70%、94%和27%。在解剖学评估中,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为49%、85%、77%和64%。对于已确诊的大胆脂瘤,敏感性为86%。在解剖学评估中,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为51%、57%、88%和18%。对于已确诊的小胆脂瘤,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为59%、78%、92%和30%。在解剖学评估中,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为40%、85%、60%和71%。FTS-nEPID可能有助于诊断胆脂瘤。由于存在许多假阴性结果,解剖学评估需要进一步研究。