Mosier Michael J, Peter Tony, Gamelli Richard L
From the *Department of Surgery, Loyola Burn Center, and †Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois.
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000293.
Scald burns are the most common thermal injury among children. A small subset of pediatric scald burns are complicated by the need for mechanical ventilation (MV). Studies suggest that 4 to 5% of pediatric scald burns will require MV, and these patients tend to be younger with larger burns. Identifying why pediatric patients with scald burns require MV has remained unclear, and few studies have sought to elucidate possible mechanisms. After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric patients with scald burns admitted to the Burn Center between 2010 and 2013 was conducted. Variables collected included age, sex, weight, height, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status or type of insurance, hospital length of stay, burn size and location, Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS) involvement, time to intubation from admission, reason for intubation, need for MV, duration of MV, need for operative intervention, 24-hour and 48-hour total fluid intake and urine output, glucose levels, infectious complications, comorbidities, and mortality. Patients who required MV were then compared with those who did not require MV to identify statistically significant differences between groups. The MV patients (n = 6) and nonventilated patients (n = 339) did not show significant differences in regards to gender, body mass index, ethnicity, and type of insurance; however, MV patients were younger and had larger burns. The mean age of MV patients was 8.2 + 5.0 months compared with 40.7 + 45.2 months for non-MV (P = .002). The mean percentage of TBSA burn in MV patients was 17.3 + 9.0% compared with 4.5 + 3.9% for non-MV (P < .001). Burn location was significant, and 66.6% of MV patients had burns on the face or neck compared with 23.6% of non-MV (P = .015). MV patients were more likely to have been victims of child abuse, as DCFS was involved in 67% of MV patients vs. 28% of non-MV patients (P = .036). Fifty percent of patients requiring MV had either a preceding upper respiratory infection, diagnosis of asthma, or congenital defects, compared with 6% of non-MV patients (P = .004). MV patients received more fluids for 48 hours compared with non-MV patients (2275.7 vs. 1332.3 ml, P = .013) and had a higher 48-hour urine output (2.34 vs. 1.34 ml/kg/hr, P = .013). Pediatric scald burns that require MV have an increased mortality risk and length of stay. MV patients were younger with larger burns. They received more fluids than non-MV patients, and child abuse, asthma, and stress hyperglycemia within the first 72 hours of injury were common among MV patients. Importantly, burn size and previous history of asthma were found to be independent predictors of the need for MV.
烫伤是儿童中最常见的热损伤。一小部分小儿烫伤会因需要机械通气(MV)而变得复杂。研究表明,4%至5%的小儿烫伤需要MV,这些患者往往年龄更小,烧伤面积更大。目前尚不清楚小儿烫伤患者需要MV的原因,很少有研究试图阐明可能的机制。经机构审查委员会批准,对2010年至2013年间入住烧伤中心的所有小儿烫伤患者进行了回顾性研究。收集的变量包括年龄、性别、体重、身高、种族、民族、社会经济地位或保险类型、住院时间、烧伤面积和部位、儿童及家庭服务部(DCFS)的参与情况、入院至插管的时间、插管原因、是否需要MV、MV持续时间、是否需要手术干预、24小时和48小时的总液体摄入量和尿量、血糖水平、感染并发症、合并症以及死亡率。然后将需要MV的患者与不需要MV的患者进行比较,以确定两组之间的统计学显著差异。MV患者(n = 6)和未通气患者(n = 339)在性别、体重指数、民族和保险类型方面没有显著差异;然而,MV患者年龄更小,烧伤面积更大。MV患者的平均年龄为8.2±5.0个月,而非MV患者为40.7±45.2个月(P = 0.002)。MV患者的平均烧伤总面积百分比为17.3±9.0%,而非MV患者为4.5±3.9%(P < 0.001)。烧伤部位有显著差异,66.6%的MV患者面部或颈部有烧伤,而非MV患者为23.6%(P = 0.015)。MV患者更有可能是虐待儿童的受害者,因为DCFS参与了67%的MV患者,而非MV患者为28%(P = 0.036)。需要MV的患者中有50%在之前患有上呼吸道感染、被诊断为哮喘或有先天性缺陷,而非MV患者为6%(P = 0.004)。与非MV患者相比,MV患者在48小时内接受的液体更多(2275.7对1332.3毫升,P = 0.013),48小时尿量更高(2.34对1.34毫升/千克/小时,P = 0.013)。需要MV的小儿烫伤患者死亡风险和住院时间增加。MV患者年龄更小,烧伤面积更大。他们比非MV患者接受更多的液体,并且在受伤后的前72小时内,虐待儿童、哮喘和应激性高血糖在MV患者中很常见。重要的是,烧伤面积和哮喘既往史被发现是需要MV的独立预测因素。