Davies Mark G, El-Sayed Hosam F
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602815602074. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
To compare the objective performance goals (OPGs) and patient-centered outcomes of isolated tibial interventions in patients with tissue loss who were on hemodialysis (HD) to patients with tissue loss who were not on HD.
Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified 242 critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients who underwent isolated tibial interventions for tissue loss in a single limb between 2007 and 2012. The 78 patients (mean age 66±12 years; 44 men) on HD were compared with 164 patients (mean age 50±13 years; 82 men) who were not on HD. There was an equal distribution of the tibial vessels treated; 152 (63%) patients had more than one treated tibial vessel. Patient-centered outcomes of clinical efficacy (absence of recurrent symptoms, maintenance of ambulation, and no major amputation), amputation-free survival (AFS), and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) were evaluated. The Society for Vascular Surgery OPGs were defined at 30 days and 1 year.
The 30-day major adverse cardiac events was significantly higher (p=0.004) in the HD group (5, 5%) compared with the no-HD group (0%), but both remained under the stated OPG of ≤10%. The 30-day MALE rates were significantly higher than the stated ≤9% OPG at 13% and 18% for the no-HD and HD groups, respectively. At 1 year, the rates for AFS, freedom from MALE, limb salvage, and survival did not achieve the stated Society for Vascular Surgery OPGs in the HD group. Clinical efficacy was 61% and 25% at 3 years for the no-HD and HD groups, respectively (p<0.01). Overall, AFS was 54% and 22% and freedom from MALE was 56% and 27% at 3 years for the no-HD and HD groups, respectively (both p<0.01).
Tibial intervention for tissue loss in patients on HD is a valid treatment option but is associated with a high MALE rate. Three-year outcomes remain relatively poor, with <25% success in terms of clinical efficacy and AFS.
比较接受血液透析(HD)的组织缺损患者与未接受HD的组织缺损患者进行单纯胫骨干预的客观性能目标(OPG)和以患者为中心的结局。
对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行查询,确定了242例在2007年至2012年间因单肢组织缺损而接受单纯胫骨干预的严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者。将78例接受HD的患者(平均年龄66±12岁;44例男性)与164例未接受HD的患者(平均年龄50±13岁;82例男性)进行比较。所治疗的胫血管分布均衡;152例(63%)患者有一条以上的胫血管接受治疗。评估了以患者为中心的临床疗效结局(无复发症状、维持行走能力且未进行大截肢)、无截肢生存(AFS)以及无重大肢体不良事件(MALE)。血管外科学会的OPG在30天和1年时进行定义。
HD组的30天重大不良心脏事件发生率(5例,5%)显著高于非HD组(0%)(p = 0.004),但两组均保持在规定的OPG≤10%以下。非HD组和HD组的30天MALE发生率分别显著高于规定的≤9%的OPG,为13%和18%。在1年时,HD组的AFS、无MALE、肢体挽救和生存发生率均未达到血管外科学会规定的OPG。非HD组和HD组在3年时的临床疗效分别为61%和25%(p<0.01)。总体而言,非HD组和HD组在3年时的AFS分别为54%和22%,无MALE分别为56%和27%(均p<0.01)。
对接受HD的患者进行胫骨干预治疗组织缺损是一种有效的治疗选择,但MALE发生率较高。三年的结局仍然相对较差,临床疗效和AFS的成功率均低于25%。