De Hert Marc, Sermon Jan, Geerts Paul, Vansteelandt Kristof, Peuskens Joseph, Detraux Johan
Department of Neurosciences, Z.org KU Leuven-University Psychiatric Centre, UPC KUL Campus Kortenberg, Leuvensesteenweg 517, 3070, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Janssen-Cilag NV, Health Economics, Market Access and Reimbursement-Neuroscience, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
CNS Drugs. 2015 Aug;29(8):637-58. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0269-4.
Although continuous treatment with antipsychotics is still recommended as the gold standard treatment paradigm for all patients with schizophrenia, some clinicians question whether continuous antipsychotic treatment is necessary, or even justified, for every patient with schizophrenia who has been stabilized on antipsychotics.
The primary objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were (i) to compare relapse/hospitalization risks of stabilized patients with schizophrenia under active versus intermittent or placebo treatment conditions; (ii) to examine the role of several study characteristics, possibly intervening in the relationship between relapse risk and treatment condition; and (iii) to examine whether time to relapse is associated with antipsychotic treatment duration.
A systematic literature search, using the MEDLINE database (1950 until November 2014), was conducted for English-language published randomized controlled trials, covering a follow-up time period of at least 6 months, and investigating relapse/rehospitalization and/or time-to-relapse rates with placebo or intermittent treatment strategies versus continuous treatment with oral and long-acting injectable first- or second-generation antipsychotics (FGAs/SGAs) in stabilized patients with schizophrenia. Additional studies were identified through searches of reference lists of other identified systematic reviews and Cochrane reports. Two meta-analyses (placebo versus continuous and intermittent versus continuous treatment) were performed to obtain an optimal estimation of the relapse/hospitalization risks of stabilized patients with schizophrenia under these treatment conditions and to assess the role of study characteristics. For time-to-relapse data, a descriptive analysis was performed.
Forty-eight reports were selected as potentially eligible for our meta-analysis. Of these, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five records, identified through Cochrane and other systematic reviews and fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were added, resulting in a total of 46 records. Stabilized patients with schizophrenia who have been exposed for at least 6 months to intermittent or placebo strategies, respectively, have a 3 (odds ratio [OR] 3.36; 95% CI 2.36-5.45; p < 0.0001) to 6 (OR 5.64; 95% CI 4.47-7.11; p < 0.0001) times increased risk of relapse, compared with patients on continuous treatment. The availability of rescue medication (p = 0.0102) was the only study characteristic explaining systematic differences in the OR for relapse between placebo versus continuous treatment across studies. Studies reporting time-to-relapse data show that the time to (impending) relapse is always significantly delayed with continuous treatment, compared with placebo or intermittent treatment strategies. Although the interval between treatment discontinuation and symptom recurrence can be highly variable, mean time-to-relapse data seem to indicate a failure of clinical stability before 7-14 months with intermittent and before 5 months with placebo treatment strategies. For all reports included in this systematic review, median time-to-relapse rates in the continuous treatment group were not estimable as <50% of the patients in this treatment condition relapsed before the end of the study.
With continuous treatment, patients have a lower risk of relapse and remain relapse free for a longer period of time compared with placebo and intermittent treatment strategies. Moreover, 'success rates' in the intermittent treatment conditions are expected to be an overestimate of actual outcome rates. Therefore, continuous treatment remains the 'gold standard' for good clinical practice, particularly as, until now, only a few and rather general valid predictors for relapse in schizophrenia are known and subsequent relapses may contribute to functional deterioration as well as treatment resistance in patients with schizophrenia.
尽管抗精神病药物持续治疗仍被推荐为所有精神分裂症患者的金标准治疗模式,但一些临床医生质疑,对于每一位使用抗精神病药物病情已稳定的精神分裂症患者,持续抗精神病药物治疗是否必要甚至合理。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是:(i)比较病情稳定的精神分裂症患者在积极治疗与间歇治疗或安慰剂治疗条件下的复发/住院风险;(ii)研究几个可能干预复发风险与治疗条件之间关系的研究特征的作用;(iii)研究复发时间是否与抗精神病药物治疗持续时间相关。
使用MEDLINE数据库(1950年至2014年11月)进行系统文献检索,查找以英文发表的随机对照试验,这些试验随访时间至少6个月,研究病情稳定的精神分裂症患者使用安慰剂或间歇治疗策略与口服及长效注射第一代或第二代抗精神病药物(FGA/SGA)持续治疗的复发/再住院率和/或复发时间率。通过检索其他已识别的系统评价和Cochrane报告的参考文献列表来识别其他研究。进行了两项荟萃分析(安慰剂与持续治疗以及间歇治疗与持续治疗),以最佳估计病情稳定的精神分裂症患者在这些治疗条件下的复发/住院风险,并评估研究特征的作用。对于复发时间数据,进行了描述性分析。
48篇报告被选为可能符合我们荟萃分析的条件。其中,21篇符合纳入标准。通过Cochrane和其他系统评价识别并符合纳入标准的25条记录被纳入,最终共有46条记录。与持续治疗的患者相比,分别接受至少6个月间歇治疗或安慰剂治疗的病情稳定的精神分裂症患者复发风险增加3倍(比值比[OR]3.36;95%CI 2.36 - 5.45;p < 0.0001)至6倍(OR 5.64;95%CI 4.47 - 7.11;p < 0.0001)。救援药物的可用性(p = 0.0102)是唯一能解释各研究中安慰剂与持续治疗之间复发OR值系统差异的研究特征。报告复发时间数据的研究表明,与安慰剂或间歇治疗策略相比,持续治疗总是能显著延迟(即将)复发的时间。尽管治疗中断与症状复发之间的间隔可能差异很大,但平均复发时间数据似乎表明,间歇治疗在7 - 14个月前、安慰剂治疗在5个月前临床稳定性会丧失。对于本系统评价纳入的所有报告,持续治疗组的复发时间中位数无法估计,因为该治疗条件下不到50%的患者在研究结束前复发。
与安慰剂和间歇治疗策略相比,持续治疗的患者复发风险更低,且更长时间不复发。此外,间歇治疗条件下的“成功率”预计高估了实际结果率。因此,持续治疗仍然是良好临床实践的“金标准”,特别是因为到目前为止,已知的精神分裂症复发有效预测因素很少且相当笼统,后续复发可能导致患者功能恶化以及产生治疗抵抗。