Orbay Hakan, Busse Brittany K, Stevenson Thomas R, Wang Howard T, Sahar David E
University of California Davis Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sacramento, Calif.; and University of Texas San Antonio Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, San Antonio, Tex.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Aug 10;3(7):e455. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000428. eCollection 2015 Jul.
Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction requires complex microsurgical skills. Herein, we examine whether DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed safely without microsurgical fellowship training.
A total of 28 patients and 34 DIEP flaps were included in the study. We reviewed the medical records of patients for donor site and flap-related complications and analyzed the correlation between the complications and preoperative risk factors. We also performed a literature review to compare complication rates in our series with the literature.
We observed total flap necrosis in 1 patient (2.9%), partial flap necrosis in 5 patients (14.7%), infection in 1 patient (2.9%), hematoma/seroma in 3 patients (8.8%), donor site complications in 5 patients (18.5%), venous occlusion in 4 patients (11.7%), and arterial occlusion in 1 patient (2.9%). We did not observe any correlation between complications and preoperative risk factors. Literature review yielded 18 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Partial flap necrosis rate was significantly higher in our series compared with literature (14.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.003). Venous complication rate was marginally higher in our series compared with literature (11.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.057). However, total flap loss rate in our series was comparable with the literature (2.9% vs 2.2%, P = 0.759).
With proper training during plastic surgery residency, DIEP flap can be performed with acceptable morbidity.
腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建需要复杂的显微外科技能。在此,我们研究了在没有显微外科专科培训的情况下,DIEP皮瓣乳房重建是否能够安全进行。
本研究共纳入28例患者及34个DIEP皮瓣。我们回顾了患者的病历以了解供区和皮瓣相关并发症,并分析了并发症与术前危险因素之间的相关性。我们还进行了文献综述,以将我们系列中的并发症发生率与文献进行比较。
我们观察到1例患者出现皮瓣完全坏死(2.9%),5例患者出现部分皮瓣坏死(14.7%),1例患者出现感染(2.9%),3例患者出现血肿/血清肿(8.8%),5例患者出现供区并发症(18.5%),4例患者出现静脉阻塞(11.7%),1例患者出现动脉阻塞(2.9%)。我们未观察到并发症与术前危险因素之间存在任何相关性。文献综述得到18篇符合我们纳入标准的论文。与文献相比,我们系列中的部分皮瓣坏死率显著更高(14.7%对1.6%,P = 0.003)。与文献相比,我们系列中的静脉并发症发生率略高(11.7%对3.3%,P = 0.057)。然而,我们系列中的皮瓣完全丢失率与文献相当(2.9%对2.2%,P = 0.759)。
通过整形外科学住院医师培训期间的适当训练,DIEP皮瓣可以在可接受的发病率情况下进行。