Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Department of Child Development, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):646-655. doi: 10.1002/wcs.143. Epub 2011 May 9.
We consider research and theory relevant to the notion of informal learning. Beginning with historical and definitional issues, we argue that learning happens not just in schools or in school-aged children. Many theorists have contrasted informal learning with formal learning. Moving beyond this dichotomy, and away from a focus on where learning occurs, we discuss five dimensions of informal learning that are drawn from the literature: (1) non-didactive, (2) highly socially collaborative, (3) embedded in meaningful activity, (4) initiated by learner's interest or choice, and (5) removed from external assessment. We consider these dimensions in the context of four sample domains: learning a first language, learning about the mind and emotions within families and communities, learning about science in family conversations and museum settings, and workplace learning. Finally, we conclude by considering convergences and divergences across the different literatures and suggesting areas for future research. WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 646-655 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.143 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
我们研究了与非正式学习概念相关的研究和理论。从历史和定义问题开始,我们认为学习不仅发生在学校或学龄儿童中。许多理论家将非正式学习与正式学习进行了对比。超越这种二分法,并且不再关注学习发生的地点,我们从文献中讨论了非正式学习的五个维度:(1)非教学性,(2)高度协作的社会性,(3)嵌入有意义的活动中,(4)由学习者的兴趣或选择发起,以及(5)远离外部评估。我们在四个示例领域的背景下考虑了这些维度:学习第一语言、在家庭和社区中学习关于心理和情感的知识、在家庭对话和博物馆环境中学习科学,以及工作场所学习。最后,我们通过考虑不同文献之间的趋同和分歧来得出结论,并提出了未来研究的领域。WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 646-655 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.143 如需了解本文相关资源,请访问 WIREs 网站。