Laurenti Luca, Innocenti Idanna, Autore Francesco, Vannata Barbara, Efremov Dimitar G, Ciolli Stefania, Del Poeta Giovanni, Mauro Francesca Romana, Cortelezzi Agostino, Borza Paola Anticoli, Ghio Francesco, Mondello Patrizia, Murru Roberta, Gozzetti Alessandro, Cariccio Maria Rosa Lanza, Piccirillo Nicola, Boncompagni Riccardo, Cantonetti Maria, Principe Maria Ilaria Del, Reda Gianluigi, Bongarzoni Velia, Cervetti Giulia, Pitini Vincenzo, Foà Robin, Sica Simona, D'Arena Giovanni
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Rome, Italy.
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Rome, Italy.
Leuk Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):1066-70. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
The front-line therapy for CLL young and fit patients is chemo-immunotherapy with fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR). FCR regimen results in a significant myelosuppression and high rates of early and late infections especially in elderly patients. German CLL study group compared FCR vs. bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in fit untreated patients. The response rates with BR or FCR were comparable, BR could be an alternative 1st-line treatment for elderly patients. Here we report retrospective data of 70 elderly (≥65 years) CLL patients from 12 Italian centers treated with BR as front-line therapy. The primary end points were overall response rate (complete remission/partial remission) and safety. Forty-seven males and 23 females, with a median age of 72 years, were included in the study. Eight patients were unfit for CIRS. The OR rate was 88.6% (31.4% CR and 57.2% PR). Progression free survival, treatment free survival and overall survival rates at 2-years were 79%, 90.3% and 89.6%, respectively. Only del17 was independent unfavorable parameter on the response rate and PFS. Our results indicate that BR front-line at standard dose provides a high response rate with a good safety profile, even if more than 50% of patients experienced a bendamustine dose reduction until 70 mg/m2.
对于年轻且身体状况良好的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者,一线治疗方案是采用氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺-利妥昔单抗(FCR)进行化学免疫疗法。FCR方案会导致显著的骨髓抑制以及较高的早期和晚期感染率,尤其是在老年患者中。德国CLL研究组对身体状况良好的未治疗患者比较了FCR与苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗(BR)。BR或FCR的缓解率相当,BR可以作为老年患者的一线替代治疗方案。在此,我们报告了来自12个意大利中心的70例老年(≥65岁)CLL患者接受BR作为一线治疗的回顾性数据。主要终点是总缓解率(完全缓解/部分缓解)和安全性。47例男性和23例女性,中位年龄为72岁,纳入了本研究。8例患者不符合CIRS标准。总缓解率为88.6%(完全缓解率31.4%,部分缓解率57.2%)。2年时的无进展生存率、无治疗生存率和总生存率分别为79%、90.3%和89.6%。只有del17是影响缓解率和无进展生存期的独立不良参数。我们的结果表明,标准剂量的BR一线治疗具有高缓解率和良好的安全性,即使超过50%的患者经历了苯达莫司汀剂量减少至70mg/m²。