Tomlinson Andrew R, Jameson Mark J, Pagedar Nitin A, Schoeff Stephen S, Shearer A Eliot, Boyd Nathan H
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Sep;141(9):816-21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1485.
We present what we believe to be the first case series in which the teres major muscle is used as a free flap in head and neck reconstruction.
To describe our experience with the teres major muscle in free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects and to identify advantages of this approach.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review was performed at 2 tertiary care centers between February 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012. Data analysis was conducted from July 31, 2014, through December 1, 2014.
Teres major muscle free flap for use in head and neck reconstruction.
Indications for use, complications, and outcomes including donor site morbidity.
The teres major free flap was used in 11 patients as a component of chimeric subscapular system free flaps for a variety of complex head and neck defects. The teres major muscle was used to fill soft-tissue defects of the neck, face, and nasal cavity; it provided substantial soft-tissue volume but was less bulky than the latissimus dorsi muscle. The teres major muscle was also used to provide protection for vascular anastomoses and/or great vessels and to enhance soft-tissue coverage of the mandibular reconstruction plate. In addition, the muscle was selected as a substrate for skin grafting where inadequate neck skin remained. Flap survival occurred in 10 of 11 flaps (91%). Two flaps (18%) demonstrated venous congestion that was managed successfully. Two patients (18%) developed minor recipient-site complications (submental fistula and infection with recurrent wound dehiscence and plate exposure). All donor sites healed well, with chronic, mild shoulder pain noted in 2 patients (18%) and no postoperative seromas observed in any patient.
Addition of the teres major muscle to a subscapular system free flap is an option for reconstruction of a variety of complex head and neck defects, particularly when a moderate amount of soft tissue is required. In select cases, the teres major muscle may have advantages over the latissimus dorsi muscle.
我们呈现了我们认为的首例将大圆肌用作游离皮瓣进行头颈部重建的病例系列。
描述我们在使用大圆肌游离皮瓣重建头颈部缺损方面的经验,并确定这种方法的优势。
设计、地点和参与者:在2007年2月1日至2012年6月30日期间,对2家三级医疗中心进行了回顾性研究。数据分析于2014年7月31日至2014年12月1日进行。
使用大圆肌游离皮瓣进行头颈部重建。
使用指征、并发症以及包括供区发病率在内的结局。
11例患者使用大圆肌游离皮瓣作为复合肩胛下系统游离皮瓣的一部分,用于修复各种复杂的头颈部缺损。大圆肌用于填充颈部、面部和鼻腔的软组织缺损;它提供了大量的软组织量,但比背阔肌体积小。大圆肌还用于保护血管吻合口和/或大血管,并加强下颌骨重建钢板的软组织覆盖。此外,在颈部皮肤不足时,选择该肌肉作为植皮的基底。11个皮瓣中有10个(91%)存活。2个皮瓣(18%)出现静脉淤血,经成功处理。2例患者(18%)出现轻微的受区并发症(颏下瘘管以及感染伴伤口反复裂开和钢板外露)。所有供区愈合良好,2例患者(18%)出现慢性轻度肩部疼痛,所有患者均未观察到术后血清肿。
将大圆肌添加到肩胛下系统游离皮瓣中是修复各种复杂头颈部缺损的一种选择,特别是在需要适量软组织时。在某些情况下,大圆肌可能比背阔肌具有优势。