Friedrichs I, Buus C, Berger A, Keppler O T, Rabenau H F
Institute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Goethe University, National Reference Laboratory for Retroviruses, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 40, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Institute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Goethe University, National Reference Laboratory for Retroviruses, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 40, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
J Virol Methods. 2015 Nov;224:91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
The laboratory diagnosis of an HIV infection mainly depends on the detection of HIV-specific antibodies/HIV p24 antigen whereby different algorithms for the confirmation of reactive screening assays exist. The objective of the present study was to compare the performance of two supplemental HIV antibody confirmatory assays: the Geenius™ HIV1/2 Confirmatory Assay and the recomLine HIV-1 & HIV-2 IgG Line Immunoassay. Therefore 279 serum samples previously analyzed for HIV during routine diagnostics at the Institute for Medical Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, University Hospital Frankfurt, were analyzed retrospectively. 96.8% samples had concordant results in both HIV confirmatory assays, whereby the Geenius Assay showed a discrimination rate of 100% while two HIV-1 samples were not typeable with the recomLine Assay. Overall assay sensitivity was 100% in both assays and specificity was 99.0% (recomLine Assay) and 93.4% (Geenius Assay), respectively. The κ-values for both assays indicated high agreement. Overall nine samples had discordant results from which four were from acutely EBV/CMV-infected patients and one from a patient with primary HIV-1 infection during seroconversion. In conclusion, both assays are well suited for the detection, confirmation and discrimination of HIV-1- and -2-specific antibodies.
HIV感染的实验室诊断主要依赖于检测HIV特异性抗体/HIV p24抗原,为此存在不同的算法用于确认反应性筛查试验。本研究的目的是比较两种补充性HIV抗体确认试验的性能:Geenius™ HIV1/2确认试验和重组免疫印迹法HIV-1 & HIV-2 IgG免疫测定法。因此,对法兰克福大学医院国家逆转录病毒参考中心医学病毒学研究所常规诊断期间先前检测过HIV的279份血清样本进行了回顾性分析。96.8%的样本在两种HIV确认试验中结果一致,其中Geenius试验的鉴别率为100%,而重组免疫印迹法试验无法对两份HIV-1样本进行分型。两种试验的总体检测灵敏度均为100%,特异性分别为99.0%(重组免疫印迹法试验)和93.4%(Geenius试验)。两种试验的κ值表明一致性较高。总体而言,有9份样本结果不一致,其中4份来自急性EBV/CMV感染患者,1份来自血清转换期原发性HIV-1感染患者。总之,两种试验都非常适合检测、确认和鉴别HIV-1和-2特异性抗体。