• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断2型糖尿病患者参加结构化教育的出勤率低:全科医疗特征和个体患者因素可预测参与情况。

Low attendance at structured education for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: General practice characteristics and individual patient factors predict uptake.

作者信息

Winkley Kirsty, Stahl Daniel, Chamley Mark, Stopford Rosanna, Boughdady Monica, Thomas Stephen, Amiel Stephanie A, Forbes Angus, Ismail Khalida

机构信息

Dept of Psychological Medicine, King's College London & Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.

Dept of Biostatistics, King's College London & Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.015
PMID:26319362
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims were to determine the association between individual and neighbourhood factors and attendance at structured education amongst people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

Multi-level analysis of questionnaire data from a prospective cohort of adults newly diagnosed T2DM. Setting was primary care, London, UK. Main outcome was attendance at structured education within 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 1790 people recruited, attendance data were available for 1626 (91%). Only 22.4% (n=365/1626) attended education. Attendance was independently associated with female gender (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.46), lower HbA1c (OR 0.98 mmol/mol 95% CI 0.97-0.99) and non-smoker status (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.55). General practice covariates, achievement of primary care targets for glycaemic control (OR 1.05, 95% C.I. 1.01-1.08) and recording of retinal screening (OR 0.96, 95% C.I. 0.93-0.99) were independently associated with attendance but unexplained general practice clustering accounted for 17% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

Education uptake is low amongst people with new onset T2DM. Attenders are more likely to be female, non-smokers with better HbA1c. General practices achieving glycaemic targets are more likely to have patients who attend education.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Strategies are needed to improve attendance at structured diabetes education particularly amongst hard to reach groups.

摘要

目的

确定个体因素和社区因素与新诊断的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者参加结构化教育之间的关联。

方法

对新诊断T2DM的成年前瞻性队列的问卷数据进行多层次分析。研究地点为英国伦敦的初级医疗保健机构。主要结局是在2年内参加结构化教育的情况。

结果

在招募的1790人中,有1626人(91%)可获取出勤数据。只有22.4%(n = 365/1626)的人参加了教育。出勤情况与女性性别(比值比[OR] 1.28,95%置信区间[CI] 1.05 - 1.46)、较低的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平(OR 0.98 mmol/mol,95% CI 0.97 - 0.99)和非吸烟状态(OR 1.36,95% CI 1.07 - 1.55)独立相关。全科医疗协变量、血糖控制初级保健目标的达成情况(OR 1.05,95% CI 1.01 - 1.08)以及视网膜筛查记录(OR 0.96,95% CI 0.93 - 0.9)与出勤独立相关,但无法解释的全科医疗聚类占变异的17%。

结论

新发病的T2DM患者中教育参与率较低。参加者更可能是女性、非吸烟者且HbA1c水平较好。实现血糖目标的全科医疗更可能有患者参加教育。

实践意义

需要采取策略来提高结构化糖尿病教育的参与率,特别是在难以接触到的群体中。

相似文献

1
Low attendance at structured education for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: General practice characteristics and individual patient factors predict uptake.新诊断2型糖尿病患者参加结构化教育的出勤率低:全科医疗特征和个体患者因素可预测参与情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
2
Patient explanations for non-attendance at structured diabetes education sessions for newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.新诊断2型糖尿病患者未参加结构化糖尿病教育课程的原因:一项定性研究
Diabet Med. 2015 Jan;32(1):120-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12556. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
3
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
4
Healthcare professionals' views of group structured education for people with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.医疗保健专业人员对新诊断的2型糖尿病患者进行小组结构化教育的看法。
Diabet Med. 2018 Jul;35(7):911-919. doi: 10.1111/dme.13637. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Factors influencing attendance at structured education for Type 1 diabetes in south London.影响伦敦南部1型糖尿病患者参加结构化教育的因素。
Diabet Med. 2017 Jun;34(6):828-833. doi: 10.1111/dme.13333. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Predictors of attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening among people with type 2 diabetes: Secondary analysis of data from primary care.2型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变筛查就诊率的预测因素:来自初级保健数据的二次分析
Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Dec;15(6):1086-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
7
Disparities in attendance at diabetes self-management education programs after diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a cohort study.加拿大安大略省诊断后参加糖尿病自我管理教育计划的差异:一项队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 30;13:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-85.
8
Association between participation in a brief diabetes education programme and glycaemic control in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes.参与简短糖尿病教育项目与新诊断糖尿病成人血糖控制之间的关联。
Diabet Med. 2014 Dec;31(12):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/dme.12513. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Barriers and facilitators to attendance at Type 2 diabetes structured education programmes: a qualitative study of educators and attendees.2 型糖尿病结构化教育计划参与的障碍和促进因素:教育者和参与者的定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jan;36(1):70-79. doi: 10.1111/dme.13805. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.提高糖尿病视网膜病变筛查参与率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 15;1(1):CD012054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012054.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of a Primary Care Diabetes Education and Self-Management Program in Ireland: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study.爱尔兰初级保健糖尿病教育与自我管理项目的有效性:一项为期6个月的随访研究。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Mar;8(2):e70036. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70036.
2
Underserved 'Deep End' populations: a critical analysis addressing the power imbalance in research.服务不足的“极端”人群:一项针对研究中权力不平衡问题的批判性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):326-329. doi: 10.3399/bjgp23X733461. Print 2023 Jul.
3
Effectiveness of the nutrition referral system in a multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer clinic.
多学科胰腺癌临床营养转诊系统的有效性。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 6;31(6):322. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07795-3.
4
Integrating Self-Management Education and Support in Routine Care of People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptional Model Based on Critical Interpretive Synthesis and A Consensus-Building Participatory Consultation.将自我管理教育与支持融入2型糖尿病患者的常规护理:基于批判性解释性综合和共识建立参与性咨询的概念模型
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022 Jun 3;3:845547. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.845547. eCollection 2022.
5
Predictors of fear of diabetes progression: A multi-center cross-sectional study for patients self-management and healthcare professions education.预测糖尿病进展恐惧的因素:一项针对患者自我管理和医疗保健专业教育的多中心横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;10:910145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.910145. eCollection 2022.
6
The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Self-Efficacy-Focused Structured Education Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China Setting.中国内地 2 型糖尿病患者以自我效能为焦点的结构化教育方案的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;9:767123. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.767123. eCollection 2021.
7
Patient-specific factors associated with use of diabetes self-management education and support programs in Louisiana.与路易斯安那州糖尿病自我管理教育和支持计划使用相关的患者特定因素。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002136.
8
Socioeconomic status is not associated with the delivery of care in people with diabetes but does modify HbA1c levels: An observational cohort study (Elzha-cohort 1).社会经济地位与糖尿病患者的护理提供无关,但会改变糖化血红蛋白水平:一项观察性队列研究(Elzha 队列 1)。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e13962. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13962. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
9
Cascade screening for glaucoma in high-risk family members of African-Caribbean glaucoma patients in an urban population in London.对伦敦城市中非洲加勒比裔青光眼患者高危家族成员进行青光眼级联筛查。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;106(3):376-380. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317373. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
User Experiences With a Type 2 Diabetes Coaching App: Qualitative Study.2型糖尿病辅导应用程序的用户体验:定性研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2020 Jul 17;5(3):e16692. doi: 10.2196/16692.