能带重要性函数的推导：跨程序比较。

Derivations of the band-importance function: A cross-procedure comparison.

作者信息

Jin In-Ki, Kates James M, Lee Kyoungwon, Arehart Kathryn H

机构信息

Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Hallym University, 1 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do 200-702, South Korea.

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Aug;138(2):938-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4927412.

DOI:10.1121/1.4927412

PMID:26328709

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare band-importance functions (BIFs) derived by two different procedures. Intelligibility data from native speakers of Korean were used. BIFs were derived using an established procedure reported by Studebaker and Sherbecoe [J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 34, 427-438 (1991)] and by a recently published method reported by Kates [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134(5), EL459-EL464 (2013)]. The BIFs produced by the two different procedures were similar. These results indicate that the BIF calculation procedure by Kates is accurate for sentences as well as for the monosyllables used in its derivation.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较通过两种不同程序得出的频带重要性函数（BIF）。使用了以韩语为母语者的可懂度数据。频带重要性函数是采用斯特迪贝克和谢贝科报告的既定程序[《言语、语言和听觉研究杂志》34, 427 - 438(1991)]以及凯茨最近发表的方法[《美国声学学会杂志》134(5), EL459 - EL464(2013)]得出的。由这两种不同程序产生的频带重要性函数相似。这些结果表明，凯茨的频带重要性函数计算程序对于句子以及其推导中使用的单音节词都是准确的。