Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
Department of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec;150(12):1141-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1687.
Based on the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial exclusion criteria, patients with T1N0 or T2N0 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are recommended to undergo axillary lymph node dissection if extranodal extension (ENE) is present.
To determine the effect of ENE size on residual axillary nodal burden, disease recurrence, and survival in patients meeting Z0011 criteria.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients had T1 or T2 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive SLNs. The ENE was classified as 2 mm or smaller or as larger than 2 mm.
Nodal burden, disease recurrence, and overall survival.
Of 208 patients, 149 (71.6%) had no ENE, 21 (10.1%) had ENE 2 mm or smaller, and 38 (18.3%) had ENE larger than 2 mm on SLN dissection. The median follow-up time was 60 months (range, 1-158 months). The mean (SD) total number of positive lymph nodes differed significantly for the group with no ENE (1.72 [1.39]) vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller (3.22 [2.09]; P < .001) and vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm (4.26 [5.01]; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for mean (SD) nonsentinel lymph node metastases: 0.48 (1.30) for no ENE vs 1.91 (2.07) with ENE 2 mm or smaller (P = .02) and vs 2.95 (4.95) with ENE larger than 2 mm (P < .001). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 1 patient [4.8%], respectively; P = .62) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 4 patients [19.1%], respectively; P = .48). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 4 patients [10.5%], respectively; P = .19) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 9 patients [23.7%], respectively; P = .07).
Presence of ENE on SLN dissection is associated with N2 disease. Despite increased nodal burden, patients with 1 or 2 positive SLNs and ENE 2 mm or smaller demonstrated recurrence and survival rates similar to those of patients without ENE. Reporting of ENE size should be standardized and required.
根据美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组 Z0011 试验的排除标准,如果存在额外的淋巴结外延伸 (ENE),建议 T1N0 或 T2N0 乳腺癌患者且有 1 或 2 个阳性前哨淋巴结 (SLN) 行腋窝淋巴结清扫术。
确定 ENE 大小对符合 Z0011 标准的患者残留腋窝淋巴结负担、疾病复发和生存的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日在一家三级癌症中心进行的回顾性队列研究。患者患有 T1 或 T2 乳腺癌,且有 1 或 2 个阳性 SLN。ENE 分为 2mm 或更小或大于 2mm。
淋巴结负担、疾病复发和总生存率。
在 208 名患者中,149 名(71.6%)无 ENE,21 名(10.1%)ENE 为 2mm 或更小,38 名(18.3%)ENE 大于 2mm。中位随访时间为 60 个月(范围为 1-158 个月)。无 ENE 组的总阳性淋巴结数明显高于 ENE 2mm 或更小组(1.72[1.39])和 ENE 大于 2mm 组(4.26[5.01];P<.001)。类似的模式也出现在平均(SD)非前哨淋巴结转移中:无 ENE 为 0.48(1.30),ENE 2mm 或更小为 1.91(2.07)(P=.02),ENE 大于 2mm 为 2.95(4.95)(P<.001)。对于无 ENE 组与 ENE 2mm 或更小组,复发(远处复发,分别为 4 名[2.7%]患者和 1 名[4.8%]患者;P=.62)或死亡率(分别为 18 名[12.1%]患者和 4 名[19.1%]患者;P=.48)无显著差异。对于无 ENE 组与 ENE 大于 2mm 组,复发(远处复发,分别为 4 名[2.7%]患者和 4 名[10.5%]患者;P=.19)或死亡率(分别为 18 名[12.1%]患者和 9 名[23.7%]患者;P=.07)无显著差异。
SLN 剖检中存在 ENE 与 N2 疾病有关。尽管淋巴结负担增加,但 1 或 2 个阳性 SLN 且有 ENE 2mm 或更小的患者复发和生存率与无 ENE 的患者相似。应该标准化和要求报告 ENE 大小。