Gorce Jean-Philippe, Roff Martin
a Health and Safety Laboratory , Buxton , United Kingdom.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(10):699-707. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1043052.
The purpose of this project was to develop and validate a hand wiping protocol to be used by occupational hygienists, scientists, or other competent persons, measuring skin exposure to lead in workplaces. Inadvertent lead ingestion is likely to occur once the hands of employees have become contaminated. Ideally, a hand wiping protocol should maximize the recovery of lead-based residues present on employees' hands in a cost-effective and reproducible manner. This article describes an effective and practical hand wiping procedure. Here, two standardized protocols (A and B) are designed. Protocol A is a self-wiping protocol requiring employees to wipe their own hands using four separate and successive wipes. Protocol B involves a scientist wiping the hands of employees using four wipes, followed by employees self-wiping their hands using two wipes (total of six wipes). Both protocols are defined by four wipe passes over each hand using Ghost wipes. Because this study took place in the workplace rather than in a simulated laboratory environment, only the relative (i.e., not absolute) removal efficiencies of the hand wiping protocols have been assessed. The two protocols were first evaluated at a double glazing panel manufacturing site where between 248 μg and 4544 μg of lead was found on employees' hands. A statistical analysis (t-test) on the mean relative lead levels recovered in the first parts of the protocols indicated that Protocol A was more efficient than Protocol B (73% for Protocol A vs. 65% for Protocol B). The relative recovery of the combined first two passes against the combined first three passes also confirmed the greater efficiency of Protocol A (83.3% for Protocol A vs. 76.5% for Protocol B). However, lead levels recovered on the fourth pass remain significant at more than 10% of the total recovered loadings. Nonetheless, Protocol A was preferred and further evaluated at a lead battery manufacturing site where between 149 μg and 18,784 μg of lead was found on employees' hands.
本项目的目的是开发并验证一种手部擦拭规程,供职业卫生学家、科学家或其他专业人员用于测量工作场所中皮肤的铅暴露情况。一旦员工的手部受到污染,就有可能意外摄入铅。理想情况下,手部擦拭规程应以经济高效且可重复的方式,最大限度地回收员工手上存在的铅基残留物。本文描述了一种有效且实用的手部擦拭程序。在此,设计了两种标准化规程(A和B)。规程A是一种自我擦拭规程,要求员工用四张独立且连续的擦拭布自行擦拭双手。规程B则是由一名科学家先用四张擦拭布擦拭员工的双手,然后员工再用两张擦拭布自行擦拭双手(总共六张擦拭布)。两种规程均通过使用Ghost擦拭布在每只手上擦拭四次来定义。由于本研究是在工作场所而非模拟实验室环境中进行的,因此仅评估了手部擦拭规程的相对(即非绝对)去除效率。这两种规程首先在一个双层玻璃面板制造工厂进行了评估,在那里员工手上发现的铅含量在248微克至4544微克之间。对规程第一部分中回收的平均相对铅含量进行的统计分析(t检验)表明,规程A比规程B更有效(规程A为73%,规程B为65%)。前两次擦拭的组合相对于前三次擦拭的组合的相对回收率也证实了规程A的效率更高(规程A为83.3%,规程B为76.5%)。然而,第四次擦拭回收的铅含量仍占总回收量的10%以上,仍然相当可观。尽管如此,规程A更受青睐,并在一家铅电池制造工厂进行了进一步评估,在那里员工手上发现的铅含量在149微克至18,784微克之间。