Suppr超能文献

工作场所铅暴露调查的手部自我擦拭方案

Hand Self-Wiping Protocol for the Investigation of Lead Exposure in the Workplace.

作者信息

Gorce Jean-Philippe, Roff Martin

机构信息

a Health and Safety Laboratory , Buxton , United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(10):699-707. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1043052.

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to develop and validate a hand wiping protocol to be used by occupational hygienists, scientists, or other competent persons, measuring skin exposure to lead in workplaces. Inadvertent lead ingestion is likely to occur once the hands of employees have become contaminated. Ideally, a hand wiping protocol should maximize the recovery of lead-based residues present on employees' hands in a cost-effective and reproducible manner. This article describes an effective and practical hand wiping procedure. Here, two standardized protocols (A and B) are designed. Protocol A is a self-wiping protocol requiring employees to wipe their own hands using four separate and successive wipes. Protocol B involves a scientist wiping the hands of employees using four wipes, followed by employees self-wiping their hands using two wipes (total of six wipes). Both protocols are defined by four wipe passes over each hand using Ghost wipes. Because this study took place in the workplace rather than in a simulated laboratory environment, only the relative (i.e., not absolute) removal efficiencies of the hand wiping protocols have been assessed. The two protocols were first evaluated at a double glazing panel manufacturing site where between 248 μg and 4544 μg of lead was found on employees' hands. A statistical analysis (t-test) on the mean relative lead levels recovered in the first parts of the protocols indicated that Protocol A was more efficient than Protocol B (73% for Protocol A vs. 65% for Protocol B). The relative recovery of the combined first two passes against the combined first three passes also confirmed the greater efficiency of Protocol A (83.3% for Protocol A vs. 76.5% for Protocol B). However, lead levels recovered on the fourth pass remain significant at more than 10% of the total recovered loadings. Nonetheless, Protocol A was preferred and further evaluated at a lead battery manufacturing site where between 149 μg and 18,784 μg of lead was found on employees' hands.

摘要

本项目的目的是开发并验证一种手部擦拭规程,供职业卫生学家、科学家或其他专业人员用于测量工作场所中皮肤的铅暴露情况。一旦员工的手部受到污染,就有可能意外摄入铅。理想情况下,手部擦拭规程应以经济高效且可重复的方式,最大限度地回收员工手上存在的铅基残留物。本文描述了一种有效且实用的手部擦拭程序。在此,设计了两种标准化规程(A和B)。规程A是一种自我擦拭规程,要求员工用四张独立且连续的擦拭布自行擦拭双手。规程B则是由一名科学家先用四张擦拭布擦拭员工的双手,然后员工再用两张擦拭布自行擦拭双手(总共六张擦拭布)。两种规程均通过使用Ghost擦拭布在每只手上擦拭四次来定义。由于本研究是在工作场所而非模拟实验室环境中进行的,因此仅评估了手部擦拭规程的相对(即非绝对)去除效率。这两种规程首先在一个双层玻璃面板制造工厂进行了评估,在那里员工手上发现的铅含量在248微克至4544微克之间。对规程第一部分中回收的平均相对铅含量进行的统计分析(t检验)表明,规程A比规程B更有效(规程A为73%,规程B为65%)。前两次擦拭的组合相对于前三次擦拭的组合的相对回收率也证实了规程A的效率更高(规程A为83.3%,规程B为76.5%)。然而,第四次擦拭回收的铅含量仍占总回收量的10%以上,仍然相当可观。尽管如此,规程A更受青睐,并在一家铅电池制造工厂进行了进一步评估,在那里员工手上发现的铅含量在149微克至18,784微克之间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1397/4566886/4922afc9e71d/uoeh-12-699-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hand Self-Wiping Protocol for the Investigation of Lead Exposure in the Workplace.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(10):699-707. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1043052.
2
A comparison of surface wipe media for sampling lead on hands.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Aug;3(8):428-34. doi: 10.1080/15459620600802754.
5
Field Measurements of Inadvertent Ingestion Exposure to Metals.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Nov 10;61(9):1097-1107. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx071.
7
Lessons learned from surface wipe sampling for lead in three workplaces.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Aug;14(8):611-619. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1309047.
8
Field evaluation of sequential hand wipes for flame retardant exposure in an electronics recycling facility.
Chemosphere. 2019 Mar;219:472-481. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.027. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
A preliminary comparison of three dermal exposure sampling methods: rinses, wipes and cotton gloves.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014 Jan;16(1):141-7. doi: 10.1039/c3em00511a.
10
Surface sampling for endotoxin assessment using electrostatic wiping cloths.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Jul;49(5):401-6. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mei002. Epub 2005 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Children's Metal Exposure via Hand Wipe, Outdoor Soil and Indoor Dust and Their Associations with Blood Biomarkers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;19(21):14614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114614.
2
Toluene and Heavy Metals in Small Automotive Refinishing Shops and Personal Protection of the Workers in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
J Environ Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;2021:8875666. doi: 10.1155/2021/8875666. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Exposure to pesticides and metal contaminants of fertilizer among tree planters.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Aug;55(7):752-63. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer029. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
A comparison of surface wipe media for sampling lead on hands.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Aug;3(8):428-34. doi: 10.1080/15459620600802754.
3
How important is inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances at work?
Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Oct;50(7):693-704. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel035. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
4
Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides.
Bull World Health Organ. 1962;26(1):75-91.
5
Lip lead as an alternative measure for lead exposure assessment of lead battery assembly workers.
AIHAJ. 2000 Nov-Dec;61(6):825-31. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984593.
6
Hand wash and manual skin wipes.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Oct;44(7):501-10.
7
Comparison of three methods for assessment of hand exposure to azinphos-methyl (Guthion) during apple thinning.
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999 Sep;14(9):618-23. doi: 10.1080/104732299302422.
8
Handwipe sampling and analysis procedure for the measurement of dermal contact with pesticides.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Jan;30(1):132-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00211339.
9
Dermal exposure assessment techniques.
Ann Occup Hyg. 1993 Dec;37(6):687-706. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/37.6.687.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验