von Eisenhart Rothe A F, Albarqouni L, Gärtner C, Walz L, Smenes K, Ladwig K-H
Institute of Epidemiology II, Mental Health Research Unit, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;201:581-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.067. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
Scarce evidence yields conflicting results regarding the effect of prodromal chest pain (PCP) on pre-hospital delay during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to assess the impact of PCP on delay.
Data was collected on 619 ST-elevated MI patients from the multicenter Munich Examination of Delay in Patients Experiencing Acute Myocardial Infarction (MEDEA) study. Patients with any PCP (which was subdivided into undefined PCP, possible and definite angina) within a year before AMI were identified using the Rose questionnaire, administered in bedside interviews. The influence of PCP and its subdivisions (all compared to no PCP) was assessed using logistic regression (with cut-offs of 2 h, 6 h, and a 4-category ordinal outcome).
Any type of PCP was reported by men (50.6%) more than women (34.6%) (OR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.3 to 2.8; p=.001). The median delay of patients with PCP was not significantly different to delay in patients with no PCP (p=.327). Prolonged delay times were observed in women with PCPs of lesser degree of cardiac confirmation, while the opposite was observed in men. In women, possible angina was more strongly associated with delay <2 h (OR=6.8; 95% CI=2 to 23.8) than any PCP (OR=2.6; 95% CI=1.2 to 5.7).
For men, PCPs of increasing cardiac confirmation are associated with prolonged delay. For women, PCPs of lesser cardiac confirmation are more likely to lead to prolonged delay. Future studies should investigate mediating factors.
关于前驱胸痛(PCP)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者院前延误的影响,现有证据不足且结果相互矛盾。我们旨在评估PCP对延误的影响。
从多中心慕尼黑急性心肌梗死患者延误检查(MEDEA)研究中收集了619例ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的数据。通过床边访谈使用罗斯问卷确定在AMI前一年内有任何PCP(分为未明确的PCP、可能的心绞痛和明确的心绞痛)的患者。使用逻辑回归(截断值为2小时、6小时和4分类有序结局)评估PCP及其细分类型(均与无PCP相比)的影响。
报告有任何类型PCP的男性(50.6%)多于女性(34.6%)(OR = 1.9;95%CI:1.3至2.8;p = 0.001)。有PCP患者的中位延误与无PCP患者的延误无显著差异(p = 0.327)。在心脏确诊程度较低的PCP女性患者中观察到延误时间延长,而在男性中则相反。在女性中,可能的心绞痛与<2小时的延误相关性更强(OR = 6.8;95%CI = 2至23.8),高于任何PCP(OR = 2.6;95%CI = 1.2至5.7)。
对于男性,心脏确诊程度增加的PCP与延误延长相关。对于女性,心脏确诊程度较低的PCP更有可能导致延误延长。未来的研究应调查中介因素。