Singh R K, Gupta B, Tripathi K, Singh S K
Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, UP, India.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, UP, India.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):102-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
Insulin sensitizers might influence oxidative stress to improve insulin resistance in diabetes mellitus. The present study was designed with the aim to study the effect of Metformin & Pioglitazone on markers of oxidative stress after 4 weeks of therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Type 2 DM).
This was a prospective study with follow up of 4 weeks in patients with Type 2 DM. They were randomized into metformin treated group (N=20) and Pioglitazone treated group (N=20) and healthy age-matched control group (N=20). Data was presented as mean±S.D. Student "t" test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation co-efficient tests were performed to analyze the parametric data in this study.
Baseline clinical characteristics of the two study groups were similar. There is a significant difference for Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2h-Post Prandial Plasma Glucose (PPPG) after 30 days of metformin and pioglitazone treatment. Metformin significantly reduced MDA (p=0.041) and increased SOD (p<0.001). Pioglitazone significantly reduced MDA (p<0.001) but failed to raise SOD level (p=0.132). Mean MDA was 4.57±0.57μM/L in metformin and 2.91±0.66μM/L in pioglitazone treatment with a p-value of <0.001. Further, a similar significant difference was obtained for SOD value by metformin and pioglitazone treatment (7.87±0.72U/ml vs. 6.94±0.53U/ml; p<0.001).
Pioglitazone was superior to Metformin to improve oxidative stress as reflected by reduction in MDA but the antioxidant effect i.e. increase in SOD was seen with metformin only. The differing mechanism of actions of the two drugs on oxidative stress favors co prescription of these drugs for better outcome in improving insulin resistance and diabetic complications.
胰岛素增敏剂可能会影响氧化应激,从而改善糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗。本研究旨在探讨二甲双胍和吡格列酮对2型糖尿病(2型DM)患者治疗4周后氧化应激标志物的影响。
这是一项对2型DM患者进行4周随访的前瞻性研究。将他们随机分为二甲双胍治疗组(N = 20)、吡格列酮治疗组(N = 20)和年龄匹配的健康对照组(N = 20)。数据以均值±标准差表示。本研究采用学生“t”检验、方差分析和Pearson相关系数检验来分析参数数据。
两个研究组的基线临床特征相似。二甲双胍和吡格列酮治疗30天后,空腹血糖(FPG)和餐后2小时血糖(PPPG)有显著差异。二甲双胍显著降低丙二醛(MDA)(p = 0.041)并增加超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)(p < 0.001)。吡格列酮显著降低MDA(p < 0.001),但未能提高SOD水平(p = 0.132)。二甲双胍治疗组的平均MDA为4.57±0.57μM/L,吡格列酮治疗组为2.91±0.66μM/L,p值<0.001。此外,二甲双胍和吡格列酮治疗的SOD值也有类似的显著差异(7.87±0.72U/ml对6.94±0.53U/ml;p < 0.001)。
吡格列酮在降低MDA方面优于二甲双胍,能更好地改善氧化应激,但仅二甲双胍具有抗氧化作用,即增加SOD。两种药物对氧化应激的作用机制不同,这有利于联合使用这两种药物,以更好地改善胰岛素抵抗和糖尿病并发症。