Daneman Alan, Epelman Monica
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8,
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Sep;45 Suppl 3:S406-12. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3357-1. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
This article emphasizes technical factors that are helpful for optimizing sonographic examinations of the brain in preterm and term neonates. It also reviews existing data regarding the accuracy of neurosonographic examinations relative to MR. Many neurosonographic signs are subtle and can be easily overlooked, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. Therefore meticulous attention to sonographic technique is required to maximize the diagnostic utility of this modality. Although MR images of the brain often depict abnormalities more clearly than sonography, neurosonography continues to be an exceptionally valuable tool for evaluation of the neonatal brain, even in full-term neonates. Furthermore, its accuracy is greater, even in the latter age group, than many older publications suggest. Prospective studies using state-of-the-art equipment comparing findings on sonography and MR are needed to better understand how the accuracy of these modalities changes with refinements in equipment and to help us better understand the role of neurosonography relative to MR.
本文强调了有助于优化早产儿和足月儿脑部超声检查的技术因素。它还回顾了有关神经超声检查相对于磁共振成像(MR)准确性的现有数据。许多神经超声征象很细微,容易被忽视,这可能导致诊断延迟或误诊。因此,需要对超声技术给予细致关注,以最大限度地发挥这种检查方式的诊断效用。尽管脑部磁共振成像(MR)图像通常比超声更清晰地显示异常,但神经超声检查仍然是评估新生儿脑部的一项极其有价值的工具,即使在足月儿中也是如此。此外,即使在后者这个年龄组中,其准确性也比许多早期出版物所表明的要高。需要使用最先进设备进行前瞻性研究,比较超声和磁共振成像(MR)的检查结果,以更好地了解随着设备的改进这些检查方式的准确性如何变化,并帮助我们更好地理解神经超声检查相对于磁共振成像(MR)的作用。