Funk Shawn, Lovejoy Steven, Mencio Gregory, Martus Jeffrey
*Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Medical Center East, Nashville, TN †Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001170.
Retrospective chart and radiographic review.
To evaluate spinopelvic fixation technical advancements for the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis.
Implants for vertebral and pelvic fixation have evolved without data demonstrating the benefit for neuromuscular scoliosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate this evolution in terms of deformity correction, complications, and implant cost.
Patients treated with posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis for neuromuscular scoliosis with minimum 1-year follow-up from 1998 to 2012 were reviewed. Constructs were defined as nonrigid (>50% sublaminar wire fixation with Galveston or iliac screw pelvic fixation) and rigid (≥50% pedicle screw fixation with iliac or sacral alar iliac screw pelvic fixation).
Eighty patients were identified: cerebral palsy (55%), myelomeningocele (16%), syndrome (8%), muscular dystrophy (15%), or other neuromuscular disorders (6%). A total of 95% were nonambulatory. Mean follow-up was 3.9 years (range 1-12 years). Construct types were 23 nonrigid and 57 rigid. Estimated construct cost was greater in the rigid group at $15,488 as compared with $3128 in the nonrigid group despite the lower anchor density in the rigid construct group (1.38 vs. 1.80, P < 0.001). Open anterior releases were more frequently performed in the nonrigid group (13/23 vs. 5/57, P < 0.001). Deformity correction at final follow-up was significantly greater for both Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity in the rigid group. The rates of wound infection, wound dehiscence, implant prominence, and mechanical failure of the fixation were not significantly different. The pseudarthrosis rate requiring revision surgery was 22% in nonrigid group and 5% in the rigid group (P = 0.026).
Advances in spinopelvic fixation have resulted in improved deformity correction with lower rates of pseudarthrosis and a decreased need for anterior release. This study demonstrates the benefits of modern spinopelvic fixation techniques.
回顾性图表及影像学评估。
评估脊柱骨盆固定技术在治疗神经肌肉型脊柱侧凸方面的进展。
用于椎体和骨盆固定的植入物不断发展,但尚无数据表明其对神经肌肉型脊柱侧凸有益。本研究旨在从畸形矫正、并发症及植入物成本方面评估这一进展。
回顾1998年至2012年期间接受后路脊柱融合至骨盆治疗神经肌肉型脊柱侧凸且随访至少1年的患者。固定结构分为非刚性(加尔维斯顿或髂骨螺钉骨盆固定中超过50%为椎板下钢丝固定)和刚性(髂骨或骶骨翼髂骨螺钉骨盆固定中≥50%为椎弓根螺钉固定)。
共纳入80例患者:脑性瘫痪(55%)、脊髓脊膜膨出(16%)、综合征(8%)、肌肉萎缩症(15%)或其他神经肌肉疾病(6%)。95%的患者不能行走。平均随访3.9年(范围1 - 12年)。固定结构类型为23例非刚性和57例刚性。刚性组的估计固定结构成本更高,为15488美元,而非刚性组为3128美元,尽管刚性固定结构组的锚定密度较低(1.38对1.80,P<0.001)。非刚性组更频繁地进行前路松解术(13/23对5/57,P<0.001)。在最终随访时,刚性组的Cobb角和骨盆倾斜度的畸形矫正均显著更大。伤口感染、伤口裂开、植入物突出及固定装置机械故障的发生率无显著差异。非刚性组需要翻修手术的假关节形成率为22%,刚性组为5%(P = 0.026)。
脊柱骨盆固定技术的进展已使畸形矫正得到改善,假关节形成率降低,前路松解术需求减少。本研究证明了现代脊柱骨盆固定技术的益处。