Avgil-Tsadok Meytal, Jackevicius Cynthia A, Essebag Vidal, Eisenberg Mark J, Rahme Elham, Behlouli Hassan, Pilote Louise
Louise Pilote, MD, MPH, PhD, McGill University Health Centre, 687 Pine Ave West, V Building, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1 Canada, Tel.: +1 514 934 1934 ext. 44722, Fax: +1 514 934 8293, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;115(1):152-60. doi: 10.1160/TH15-03-0247. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
In elderly patients (≥ 75 years), evidence of dabigatran efficacy is lacking and increased vigilance is warranted. We aimed to assess dabigatran effectiveness and safety in elderly patients in real-world practice. We conducted a population-based study using administrative databases, in Quebec (1999-2013). Dabigatran users (110/150 mg) were compared with matched warfarin users with regard to stroke and bleeding events. Age was categorised into < 75 or ≥ 75 years. Propensity score adjusted models were used. The cohort consisted of 15,918 dabigatran users and 47,192 matched warfarin users, with 67.3% being elderly patients. The elderly predominantly used the lower dose (80.1%) while younger patients mainly used the higher dose (80.0%). In multivariable analyses adjusted for propensity score, the risk of stroke in elderly patients using dabigatran, was no different than the risk in warfarin users (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.19) regardless of dabigatran dose. However, dabigatran was associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.76) and higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 1.30 95% CI: 1.14-1.50) when compared to warfarin. Based on real-life experience, dabigatran can offer an alternative to warfarin in elderly patients, with fewer intracranial bleeding events. However, caution is warranted for gastrointestinal bleeding.
在老年患者(≥75岁)中,缺乏达比加群疗效的证据,因此有必要提高警惕。我们旨在评估达比加群在现实临床实践中对老年患者的有效性和安全性。我们利用魁北克省(1999 - 2013年)的行政数据库进行了一项基于人群的研究。将达比加群使用者(110/150毫克)与匹配的华法林使用者在中风和出血事件方面进行比较。年龄分为<75岁或≥75岁。使用倾向评分调整模型。该队列由15918名达比加群使用者和47192名匹配的华法林使用者组成,其中67.3%为老年患者。老年患者主要使用较低剂量(80.1%),而年轻患者主要使用较高剂量(80.0%)。在针对倾向评分进行调整的多变量分析中,无论达比加群剂量如何,使用达比加群的老年患者中风风险与华法林使用者无异(风险比1.05,95%置信区间:0.93,1.19)。然而,与华法林相比,达比加群与较低的颅内出血发生率(风险比0.60,95%置信区间:0.47 - 0.76)和较高的胃肠道出血发生率相关(风险比1.30,95%置信区间:1.14 - 1.50)。基于实际经验,达比加群可为老年患者提供华法林之外的另一种选择,颅内出血事件较少。然而,对于胃肠道出血需谨慎。