Shavit Itai, Levit Barak, Basat Nofar Ben, Lait Dekel, Somri Mostafa, Gaitini Luis
Pediatric Emergency Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Surgery Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.033. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Establishing a definitive airway, defined as a tube placed in the trachea with cuff inflated below the vocal cords, is standard of care in pre-hospital airway management of the trauma patient. However, in this setting, and using manual in-line stabilisation of the neck, success rate of intubation by inexperience providers is suboptimal. The use of supraglottic airway devices that allow blind tracheal intubation has been suggested as an alternative method by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) programme of the American College of Surgeons. We aimed to compare intubation with the standard intubation technique (direct laryngoscopy [DL]) with blind intubation through an intubating-laryngeal mask airway (I-LMA) during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck.
A randomised, crossover manikin study was performed with 29 emergency medical technicians undergoing training for paramedic status. Outcome measures were success rate in one intubation attempt, duration of intubation, and assessment of ease-of-use.
Study subjects had a higher success rate of tracheal intubation with I-LMA than with DL (27/29 vs. 18/29, p<0.025), and I-LMA was assessed as easier to use (4 vs. 3, p<0.0001). Longer duration of intubation was found with I-LMA compared to DL (54.2 vs. 42.8s, p<0.002). Success rate of correct placement of I-LMA within the airway was 28/29 (96.5%). Time to achieve correct placement of I-LMA within the airway was shorter than duration of tracheal intubation with DL (26.9 vs. 42.8s, p<0.0001).
Novice intubators had a higher success rate of intubation with I-LMA than with DL, but duration of intubation was longer with I-LMA. Time to achieve correct placement of I-LMA within the airway was shorter than duration of tracheal intubation with DL. Findings of this simulation study suggest that in the presence of manual in-line stabilisation of the neck, I-LMA-guided intubation is the preferred technique for novice intubators.
建立确定性气道,即气管内放置带套囊且套囊充气位于声带下方的气管导管,是创伤患者院前气道管理的护理标准。然而,在此情况下,且采用手动颈部直线固定时,经验不足的施救者进行气管插管的成功率并不理想。美国外科医师学会高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)项目建议使用允许盲视气管插管的声门上气道装置作为替代方法。我们旨在比较在手动颈部直线固定期间,标准插管技术(直接喉镜检查[DL])与通过插管型喉罩气道(I-LMA)进行盲视插管的效果。
对29名接受护理人员培训的急救医疗技术人员进行了一项随机交叉模拟人研究。观察指标为一次插管尝试的成功率、插管持续时间以及易用性评估。
研究对象使用I-LMA进行气管插管的成功率高于DL(27/29对18/29,p<0.025),且I-LMA被评估为更易于使用(4分对3分,p<0.0001)。与DL相比,I-LMA的插管持续时间更长(54.2秒对42.8秒,p<0.002)。I-LMA在气道内正确放置的成功率为28/29(96.5%)。I-LMA在气道内达到正确放置的时间短于DL气管插管的持续时间(26.9秒对42.8秒,p<0.0001)。
新手插管者使用I-LMA插管的成功率高于DL,但I-LMA的插管持续时间更长。I-LMA在气道内达到正确放置的时间短于DL气管插管的持续时间。这项模拟研究的结果表明,在手动颈部直线固定的情况下,I-LMA引导插管是新手插管者的首选技术。