Suppr超能文献

16Stimator:从基因组草图组装中统计估计核糖体基因拷贝数。

16Stimator: statistical estimation of ribosomal gene copy numbers from draft genome assemblies.

作者信息

Perisin Matthew, Vetter Madlen, Gilbert Jack A, Bergelson Joy

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Committee on Microbiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

ISME J. 2016 Apr;10(4):1020-4. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.161. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

Abstract

The 16S rRNA gene (16S) is an accepted marker of bacterial taxonomic diversity, even though differences in copy number obscure the relationship between amplicon and organismal abundances. Ancestral state reconstruction methods can predict 16S copy numbers through comparisons with closely related reference genomes; however, the database of closed genomes is limited. Here, we extend the reference database of 16S copy numbers to de novo assembled draft genomes by developing 16Stimator, a method to estimate 16S copy numbers when these repetitive regions collapse during assembly. Using a read depth approach, we estimate 16S copy numbers for 12 endophytic isolates from Arabidopsis thaliana and confirm estimates by qPCR. We further apply this approach to draft genomes deposited in NCBI and demonstrate accurate copy number estimation regardless of sequencing platform, with an overall median deviation of 14%. The expanded database of isolates with 16S copy number estimates increases the power of phylogenetic correction methods for determining organismal abundances from 16S amplicon surveys.

摘要

16S核糖体RNA基因(16S)是公认的细菌分类多样性标志物,尽管拷贝数差异模糊了扩增子与生物体丰度之间的关系。祖先状态重建方法可以通过与密切相关的参考基因组进行比较来预测16S拷贝数;然而,封闭基因组的数据库是有限的。在这里,我们通过开发16Stimator将16S拷贝数的参考数据库扩展到从头组装的草图基因组,16Stimator是一种在组装过程中这些重复区域折叠时估计16S拷贝数的方法。使用读取深度方法,我们估计了来自拟南芥的12种内生分离株的16S拷贝数,并通过定量PCR证实了估计值。我们进一步将这种方法应用于NCBI中存放的草图基因组,并证明无论测序平台如何,拷贝数估计都是准确的,总体中位数偏差为14%。具有16S拷贝数估计值的分离株扩展数据库提高了从16S扩增子调查确定生物体丰度的系统发育校正方法的能力。

相似文献

1
16Stimator: statistical estimation of ribosomal gene copy numbers from draft genome assemblies.
ISME J. 2016 Apr;10(4):1020-4. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.161. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
2
The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses.
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057923. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem.
Microbiome. 2018 Feb 26;6(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0420-9.
4
Incorporating 16S gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(10):e1002743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002743. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
5
Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.
BMC Genomics. 2019 Apr 4;20(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5641-1.
7
UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction.
J Microbiol. 2018 Apr;56(4):280-285. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-8014-6. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Tissue-Associated Bacterial Alterations in Rectal Carcinoma Patients Revealed by 16S rRNA Community Profiling.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 Dec 9;6:179. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00179. eCollection 2016.
10
Long PCR-RFLP of 16S-ITS-23S rRNA genes: a high-resolution molecular tool for bacterial genotyping.
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;114(2):433-47. doi: 10.1111/jam.12057. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Human milk microbiota: what did we learn in the last 20 years?
Microbiome Res Rep. 2022 May 25;1(3):19. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2022.05. eCollection 2022.
2
From diversity to complexity: Microbial networks in soils.
Soil Biol Biochem. 2022 Jun;169:108604. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108604.
3
Questioning the Quality of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences Derived From Human Gut Metagenome-Assembled Genomes.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 4;12:822301. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.822301. eCollection 2021.
4
Development of a free radical scavenging bacterial consortium to mitigate oxidative stress in cnidarians.
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Sep;14(5):2025-2040. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13877. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Genome Size, rDNA Copy, and qPCR Assays for Symbiodiniaceae.
Front Microbiol. 2020 May 26;11:847. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00847. eCollection 2020.
8
riboSeed: leveraging prokaryotic genomic architecture to assemble across ribosomal regions.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jun 20;46(11):e68. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky212.
9
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem.
Microbiome. 2018 Feb 26;6(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0420-9.
10
Taxonomic Classification of 373 Genomes Reveals Species Misidentification and New Genospecies within the Genus .
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jul 12;8:1296. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01296. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
CNOGpro: detection and quantification of CNVs in prokaryotic whole-genome sequencing data.
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun 1;31(11):1708-15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv070. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
2
Extensive strain-level copy-number variation across human gut microbiome species.
Cell. 2015 Feb 12;160(4):583-594. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
3
rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D593-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1201. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Insights into structural variations and genome rearrangements in prokaryotic genomes.
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 1;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu600. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
5
Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S11-S1. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST).
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D206-14. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
7
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
8
Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data.
Genome Biol. 2013 May 29;14(5):R51. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r51.
9
Incorporating 16S gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(10):e1002743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002743. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验