Hasselholt Stine, Lykkesfeldt Jens, Overgaard Larsen Jytte
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK - 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Panum Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK - 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;298(12):2141-50. doi: 10.1002/ar.23266. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
In neuroscience, the optical fractionator technique is frequently used for unbiased cell number estimations. Although unbiased in theory, the practical application of the technique is often biased by the necessity of introducing a guard zone at one side of the disector to counter lost caps and/or optical limitations. Restricting the disector within the section thickness potentially introduces bias in two ways. First, the need to measure section thickness in order to obtain the disector height/section thickness fraction is challenging since both microcator measurements, microtome block advance, and measurements on re-embedded sections are potentially biased. Second, disector placement is not uniform random within the section thickness resulting in a bias in most sections with inhomogeneous cell distribution along the z axis. Re-embedded 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (hereafter methacrylate) sections were inspected for lost caps to evaluate the possibility of whole section thickness counting with the optical fractionator technique and hippocampal granular cell nucleoli density differences along the z axis were assessed with a z axis analysis. No lost caps were found in the examined re-embedded tissue and an inhomogeneous cell distribution through the section thickness was observed. In thick methacrylate sections devoid of lost caps sampling through the entire section thickness could be an acceptable alternative to the use of guard zones and the consequent biases associated with section thickness measurement and non-random placement of disectors.
在神经科学中,光学分选技术常用于无偏倚的细胞数量估计。尽管该技术在理论上是无偏倚的,但由于需要在解剖器的一侧引入一个保护区域以应对丢失的帽状物和/或光学限制,其实际应用往往存在偏差。将解剖器限制在切片厚度范围内可能会以两种方式引入偏差。首先,为了获得解剖器高度/切片厚度分数而测量切片厚度具有挑战性,因为微米测量仪测量、切片机块推进以及对重新包埋切片的测量都可能存在偏差。其次,解剖器在切片厚度内的放置并非均匀随机,这会导致在大多数沿z轴细胞分布不均匀的切片中产生偏差。检查重新包埋的甲基丙烯酸2-羟乙酯(以下简称甲基丙烯酸酯)切片是否有丢失的帽状物,以评估使用光学分选技术进行全切片厚度计数的可能性,并通过z轴分析评估海马颗粒细胞核仁密度沿z轴的差异。在所检查的重新包埋组织中未发现丢失的帽状物,并且观察到整个切片厚度内细胞分布不均匀。在没有丢失帽状物的厚甲基丙烯酸酯切片中,贯穿整个切片厚度进行采样可能是使用保护区域以及随之而来的与切片厚度测量和解剖器非随机放置相关偏差的可接受替代方法。