Douma Matthew J, Bara Gurpaul S, O'Dochartaigh Domhnall, Brindley Peter G
Trauma and Emergency Services, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T5H3V9.
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
Resuscitation can be delayed, or impaired, by insufficient vascular access. This study examines whether dual-intraosseous needles, inserted into a single porcine humerus, can facilitate rapid and concomitant fluid and medication delivery.
After inserting one- and then two-intraosseous needles into the same porcine humerus, we determined the rate of fluid administration using (i) an infusion pump set to 999mL/h, and (ii) a standard pressure-bag set to 300mmHg. Next, we concomitantly infused blood, crystalloid and medications into the same medullary canal, using the two-needle set-up. Humeri were inspected for fluid-leakage, needle-displacement, and bone damage.
Using an infusion pump, the mean normal-saline infusion-rate was significantly higher with dual-intraosseous needles compared to a single-intraosseous needle: the infusion-rate was 16mL/min using dual-needles versus 8mL/min for a single needle set-up (p<0.001). In contrast, using the pneumatic pressure-bag, the infusion rate was not statistically different when comparing dual-intraosseous needles versus single-intraosseous: the infusion-rate was 22mL/min versus 21ml/min (p=0.4) for 500mL, and 22ml/min versus 21ml/min (p=0.64) for one-litre, respectively. Blood product could be infused at a mean rate of 20mL/min through one needle while tranexamic acid was simultaneously infused through a second. There were no complications with a dual-intraosseous set-up (no fluid leakage; no needle-displacement; no high-pressure alarms, and no external bone-fractures or internal macrohistological damage) during any of our simulated resuscitation scenarios.
This is the first published study evaluating dual-intraosseous needles in a single bone. Despite limitations, this preliminary study (using a porcine humerus) suggests that dual-intraosseous needles are feasible. For critically-ill patients with limited insertion sites, dual-intraosseous (a.k.a. 'double-barrelled resuscitation') may facilitate rapid and concurrent resuscitation.
血管通路不足可能会延迟或妨碍复苏。本研究旨在探讨插入猪的单一肱骨中的双骨内针是否能促进快速并同时进行液体和药物输注。
在同一猪肱骨中先后插入一根和两根骨内针后,我们使用(i)设置为999mL/h的输液泵和(ii)设置为300mmHg的标准压力袋来确定液体输注速率。接下来,我们使用双针设置在同一骨髓腔内同时输注血液、晶体液和药物。检查肱骨是否有液体渗漏、针头移位和骨损伤。
使用输液泵时,双骨内针的生理盐水平均输注速率显著高于单骨内针:双针的输注速率为16mL/分钟,而单针设置为8mL/分钟(p<0.001)。相比之下,使用气压袋时,双骨内针与单骨内针的输注速率在统计学上没有差异:500mL时输注速率分别为22mL/分钟和21mL/分钟(p=0.4),1升时分别为22mL/分钟和21mL/分钟(p=0.64)。血液制品可通过一根针以平均20mL/分钟的速率输注,同时氨甲环酸通过另一根针输注。在我们所有的模拟复苏场景中,双骨内针设置均无并发症(无液体渗漏;无针头移位;无高压警报,且无外部骨折或内部大体组织损伤)。
这是首次发表的评估单骨内双骨内针的研究。尽管存在局限性,但这项初步研究(使用猪肱骨)表明双骨内针是可行的。对于插入部位有限且病情危急的患者,双骨内针(即“双管复苏”)可能有助于快速同时进行复苏。