Suppr超能文献

通过多感官活动记录仪比较德国体育专业学生的主观和客观睡眠参数

Comparing Subjective With Objective Sleep Parameters Via Multisensory Actigraphy in German Physical Education Students.

作者信息

Kölling Sarah, Endler Stefan, Ferrauti Alexander, Meyer Tim, Kellmann Michael

机构信息

a Faculty of Sport Science , Ruhr-University Bochum Bochum , Germany.

b Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz , Germany.

出版信息

Behav Sleep Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;14(4):389-405. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2015.1017096. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Abstract

This study compared subjective with objective sleep parameters among 72 physical education students. Furthermore, the study determined whether 24-hr recording differs from nighttime recording only. Participants wore the SenseWear Armband™ for three consecutive nights and kept a sleep log. Agreement rates ranged from moderate to low for sleep onset latency (ICC = 0.39 to 0.70) and wake after sleep onset (ICC = 0.22 to 0.59), while time in bed (ICC = 0.93 to 0.95) and total sleep time (ICC = 0.90 to 0.92) revealed strong agreement during this period. Comparing deviations between 24-hr wearing time (n = 24) and night-only application (n = 20) revealed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). As athletic populations have yet to be investigated for these purposes, this study provides useful indicators and practical implications for future studies.

摘要

本研究比较了72名体育专业学生的主观睡眠参数和客观睡眠参数。此外,该研究还确定了24小时记录与仅夜间记录是否存在差异。参与者连续三个晚上佩戴体动监测臂带(SenseWear Armband™)并记录睡眠日志。入睡潜伏期(组内相关系数ICC = 0.39至0.70)和睡眠中觉醒(ICC = 0.22至0.59)的一致性率从中度到低度不等,而卧床时间(ICC = 0.93至0.95)和总睡眠时间(ICC = 0.90至0.92)在此期间显示出高度一致性。比较24小时佩戴时间(n = 24)和仅夜间佩戴(n = 20)之间的偏差,未发现统计学差异(p > 0.05)。由于尚未针对这些目的对运动员群体进行研究,本研究为未来的研究提供了有用的指标和实际意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验