Kölling Sarah, Endler Stefan, Ferrauti Alexander, Meyer Tim, Kellmann Michael
a Faculty of Sport Science , Ruhr-University Bochum Bochum , Germany.
b Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz , Germany.
Behav Sleep Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;14(4):389-405. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2015.1017096. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
This study compared subjective with objective sleep parameters among 72 physical education students. Furthermore, the study determined whether 24-hr recording differs from nighttime recording only. Participants wore the SenseWear Armband™ for three consecutive nights and kept a sleep log. Agreement rates ranged from moderate to low for sleep onset latency (ICC = 0.39 to 0.70) and wake after sleep onset (ICC = 0.22 to 0.59), while time in bed (ICC = 0.93 to 0.95) and total sleep time (ICC = 0.90 to 0.92) revealed strong agreement during this period. Comparing deviations between 24-hr wearing time (n = 24) and night-only application (n = 20) revealed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). As athletic populations have yet to be investigated for these purposes, this study provides useful indicators and practical implications for future studies.
本研究比较了72名体育专业学生的主观睡眠参数和客观睡眠参数。此外,该研究还确定了24小时记录与仅夜间记录是否存在差异。参与者连续三个晚上佩戴体动监测臂带(SenseWear Armband™)并记录睡眠日志。入睡潜伏期(组内相关系数ICC = 0.39至0.70)和睡眠中觉醒(ICC = 0.22至0.59)的一致性率从中度到低度不等,而卧床时间(ICC = 0.93至0.95)和总睡眠时间(ICC = 0.90至0.92)在此期间显示出高度一致性。比较24小时佩戴时间(n = 24)和仅夜间佩戴(n = 20)之间的偏差,未发现统计学差异(p > 0.05)。由于尚未针对这些目的对运动员群体进行研究,本研究为未来的研究提供了有用的指标和实际意义。