Özen Mehmet, Yılmaz Gülden, Coşkun Belgin, Topçuoğlu Pervin, Öztürk Bengi, Gündüz Mehmet, Atilla Erden, Arslan Önder, Özcan Muhit, Demirer Taner, İlhan Osman, Konuk Nahide, Balık İsmail, Gürman Günhan, Akan Hamdi
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey. Phone: +90 312 595 70 99 E-mail:
Turk J Haematol. 2016 Mar 5;33(1):41-7. doi: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0010. Epub 2014 May 21.
The increased risk of infection for patients caused by construction and renovation near hematology inpatient clinics is a major concern. The use of high-efficiency particulate absorption (HEPA) filters can reduce the risk of infection. However, there is no standard protocol indicating the use of HEPA filters for patients with hematological malignancies, except for those who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This quasi-experimental study was designed to measure the efficacy of HEPA filters in preventing infections during construction.
Portable HEPA filters were placed in the rooms of patients undergoing treatment for hematological malignancies because of large-scale construction taking place near the hematology clinic. The rates of infection during the 6 months before and after the installation of the portable HEPA filters were compared. A total of 413 patients were treated during this 1-year period.
There were no significant differences in the antifungal prophylaxis and treatment regimens between the groups. The rates of infections, clinically documented infections, and invasive fungal infections decreased in all of the patients following the installation of the HEPA filters. When analyzed separately, the rates of invasive fungal infections were similar before and after the installation of HEPA filters in patients who had no neutropenia or long neutropenia duration. HEPA filters were significantly protective against infection when installed in the rooms of patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, patients who were undergoing consolidation treatment, and patients who were neutropenic for 1-14 days.
Despite the advent of construction and the summer season, during which environmental Aspergillus contamination is more prevalent, no patient or patient subgroup experienced an increase in fungal infections following the installation of HEPA filters. The protective effect of HEPA filters against infection was more pronounced in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, patients undergoing consolidation therapy, and patients with moderate neutropenia.
血液科住院门诊附近进行建筑施工和装修导致患者感染风险增加是一个主要问题。使用高效空气过滤器(HEPA)可降低感染风险。然而,除了接受异基因造血干细胞移植的患者外,尚无针对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者使用HEPA过滤器的标准方案。本准实验研究旨在测量HEPA过滤器在施工期间预防感染的效果。
由于血液科门诊附近正在进行大规模施工,便携式HEPA过滤器被放置在接受血液系统恶性肿瘤治疗的患者房间。比较了便携式HEPA过滤器安装前后6个月的感染率。在这1年期间共治疗了413例患者。
两组间抗真菌预防和治疗方案无显著差异。安装HEPA过滤器后,所有患者的感染率、临床记录感染率和侵袭性真菌感染率均下降。单独分析时,无中性粒细胞减少或中性粒细胞减少持续时间长的患者在安装HEPA过滤器前后侵袭性真菌感染率相似。当安装在急性淋巴细胞白血病患者、接受巩固治疗的患者和中性粒细胞减少1 - 14天的患者房间时,HEPA过滤器对感染有显著的预防作用。
尽管施工开始且正值夏季,此时环境曲霉菌污染更为普遍,但安装HEPA过滤器后,没有患者或患者亚组出现真菌感染增加的情况。HEPA过滤器对感染的预防作用在急性淋巴细胞白血病患者、接受巩固治疗的患者和中度中性粒细胞减少的患者中更为明显。