Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen J M, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska M E, Acerini C L, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader J K, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard K D, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh P C, Campbell F M, Arnolds S, Pieber T R, Evans M L, Dunger D B, Hovorka R
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of prolonged use of an artificial beta cell (closed-loop insulin-delivery system) in the home setting have not been established.
In two multicenter, crossover, randomized, controlled studies conducted under free-living home conditions, we compared closed-loop insulin delivery with sensor-augmented pump therapy in 58 patients with type 1 diabetes. The closed-loop system was used day and night by 33 adults and overnight by 25 children and adolescents. Participants used the closed-loop system for a 12-week period and sensor-augmented pump therapy (control) for a similar period. The primary end point was the proportion of time that the glucose level was between 70 mg and 180 mg per deciliter for adults and between 70 mg and 145 mg per deciliter for children and adolescents.
Among adults, the proportion of time that the glucose level was in the target range was 11.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 13.8) greater with the use of the closed-loop system day and night than with control therapy (P<0.001). The mean glucose level was lower during the closed-loop phase than during the control phase (difference, -11 mg per deciliter; 95% CI, -17 to -6; P<0.001), as were the area under the curve for the period when the glucose level was less than 63 mg per deciliter (39% lower; 95% CI, 24 to 51; P<0.001) and the mean glycated hemoglobin level (difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1; P=0.002). Among children and adolescents, the proportion of time with the nighttime glucose level in the target range was higher during the closed-loop phase than during the control phase (by 24.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 20.6 to 28.7; P<0.001), and the mean nighttime glucose level was lower (difference, -29 mg per deciliter; 95% CI, -39 to -20; P<0.001). The area under the curve for the period in which the day-and-night glucose levels were less than 63 mg per deciliter was lower by 42% (95% CI, 4 to 65; P=0.03). Three severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred during the closed-loop phase when the closed-loop system was not in use.
Among patients with type 1 diabetes, 12-week use of a closed-loop system, as compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy, improved glucose control, reduced hypoglycemia, and, in adults, resulted in a lower glycated hemoglobin level. (Funded by the JDRF and others; AP@home04 and APCam08 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01961622 and NCT01778348.).
在家中长期使用人工β细胞(闭环胰岛素输送系统)的可行性、安全性和有效性尚未得到证实。
在两项在自由生活的家庭条件下进行的多中心、交叉、随机、对照研究中,我们将58例1型糖尿病患者的闭环胰岛素输送与传感器增强泵疗法进行了比较。33名成年人日夜使用闭环系统,25名儿童和青少年仅在夜间使用。参与者使用闭环系统12周,并在相似时间段内使用传感器增强泵疗法(对照)。主要终点是成人血糖水平在每分升70毫克至180毫克之间以及儿童和青少年血糖水平在每分升70毫克至145毫克之间的时间比例。
在成年人中,日夜使用闭环系统时血糖水平处于目标范围内的时间比例比对照疗法高11.0个百分点(95%置信区间[CI],8.1至13.8)(P<0.001)。闭环阶段的平均血糖水平低于对照阶段(差值为每分升 -11毫克;95%CI,-17至-6;P<0.001),血糖水平低于每分升63毫克时间段的曲线下面积也更低(低39%;95%CI,24至51;P<0.001),糖化血红蛋白平均水平也更低(差值为 -0.3%;95%CI,-0.5至-0.1;P=0.002)。在儿童和青少年中,闭环阶段夜间血糖水平处于目标范围内的时间比例高于对照阶段(高24.7个百分点;95%CI,20.6至28.7;P<0.001),夜间平均血糖水平更低(差值为每分升 -29毫克;95%CI,-39至-20;P<0.001)。日夜血糖水平低于每分升63毫克时间段的曲线下面积低42%(95%CI,4至65;P=0.03)。在闭环阶段未使用闭环系统时发生了3次严重低血糖事件。
在1型糖尿病患者中,与传感器增强泵疗法相比,使用闭环系统12周可改善血糖控制、减少低血糖,并且在成年人中可使糖化血红蛋白水平降低。(由青少年糖尿病研究基金会及其他机构资助;AP@home04和APCam08临床试验注册号,NCT01961622和NCT01778348。)