Suppr超能文献

乳牙中传统玻璃离子水门汀与改良玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究。

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of conventional and modifications of glass ionomer cement in primary teeth: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Shruthi A S, Nagaveni N B, Poornima P, Selvamani M, Madhushankari G S, Subba Reddy V V

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;33(4):279-84. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.165662.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microleakage among conventional, resin modified glass ionomer cements (GIC), and compomer cements in primary teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five over retained non carious primary molars beyond exfoliation time were collected and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15). Group A: GC Fuji II; Group B: Vitremer; Group C: Compoglass F. A standard Class V cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of each tooth with no mechanical retention and restored accordingly. Then all the samples were subjected to thermocycling for 250 cycles at different temperatures and covered with nail varnish. Later, samples were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 h. Teeth were sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restoration and studied under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data obtained were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Samples restored with vitremer showed comparatively higher microleakage than the samples in other groups. However, overall there were no significant difference between the microleakage scores of the samples in all three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that none of the three GICs was free from microleakage. Hence, further research is required to compare microleakage of the newer material.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估传统型、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和复合体水门汀在乳牙中的微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

收集45颗超过脱落时间仍未脱落的非龋性乳牙,并随机分为三组(n = 15)。A组:GC Fuji II;B组:Vitremer;C组:Compoglass F。在每颗牙齿的颊面制备标准V类洞,不做机械固位,然后相应地进行修复。接着所有样本在不同温度下进行250次热循环,并用指甲油覆盖。之后,将样本浸入0.5%的亚甲蓝染料中24小时。沿修复体中心将牙齿颊舌向切开,在体视显微镜下观察染料渗透情况。使用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验对所得数据进行分析。

结果

用Vitremer修复的样本显示出比其他组样本相对更高的微渗漏。然而,总体而言,三组样本的微渗漏评分之间没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

可以得出结论,三种GIC都存在微渗漏。因此,需要进一步研究以比较新型材料的微渗漏情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验