Moon Hee Jung, Jung Inkyung, Youk Ji Hyun, Kim Min Jung, Kim Eun-Kyung
Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Surg. 2016 Jan;211(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
We investigated whether short-term follow-up in 6 months was appropriate for asymptomatic benign concordant lesions on ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy (ultrasonography-guided CNB).
Of 1,111 lesions, 944 underwent follow-up within 4 to 9 months after CNB, and 359 of 944 underwent a 2nd follow-up within 9 to 15 months. One hundred sixty-seven underwent a 1st follow-up within 9 to 15 months. Follow-up intervals were classified according to an interval of 6 and 12 months with 2 different methods. First, 944 and 167 lesions were classified into the 6- and 12-month groups. Second, 944 and 526 lesions (sum of 167 and 359 lesions) were classified into the 6- and 12-month groups. Clinicopathologic factors were compared between the 2 groups.
None of the benign concordant lesions were malignant; 1.4% of the lesions showed progression in the 6-month group, not significantly different from 1.2% and .8% of the 12-month group. Mean age, mean lesion size, final assessments, and specific or nonspecific pathologies were not different between the 2 groups.
Short-term follow-up in 6 months is unnecessary for asymptomatic benign concordant breast lesions at ultrasonography-guided CNB.
我们研究了对超声引导下粗针穿刺活检(超声引导下CNB)发现的无症状良性一致性病变进行6个月的短期随访是否合适。
在1111个病变中,944个在CNB后4至9个月内接受了随访,944个中的359个在9至15个月内接受了第二次随访。167个在9至15个月内接受了第一次随访。随访间隔根据6个月和12个月的间隔用两种不同方法进行分类。首先,将944个和167个病变分为6个月组和12个月组。其次,将944个和526个病变(167个和359个病变的总和)分为6个月组和12个月组。比较两组之间的临床病理因素。
所有良性一致性病变均未恶变;6个月组中1.4%的病变出现进展,与12个月组的1.2%和0.8%无显著差异。两组之间的平均年龄、平均病变大小、最终评估以及特异性或非特异性病理均无差异。
对于超声引导下CNB发现的无症状良性一致性乳腺病变,无需进行6个月的短期随访。