Ghotbi Adam Ali, Sander Mikael, Køber Lars, Philbert Berit Th, Gustafsson Finn, Hagemann Christoffer, Kjær Andreas, Jacobsen Peter K
The Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138124. eCollection 2015.
The optimal pacing rate during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of changing basal pacing frequencies on autonomic nerve function, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
Twelve CRT patients with non-ischemic heart failure (NYHA class II-III) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, in which the basal pacing rate was set at DDD-60 and DDD-80 for 3 months (DDD-R for 2 patients). At baseline, 3 months and 6 months, we assessed sympathetic nerve activity by microneurography (MSNA), peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (p-NT-proBNP), echocardiography and QoL.
DDD-80 pacing for 3 months increased the mean heart rate from 77.3 to 86.1 (p = 0.001) and reduced sympathetic activity compared to DDD-60 (51±14 bursts/100 cardiac cycles vs. 64±14 bursts/100 cardiac cycles, p<0.05). The mean pVO2 increased non-significantly from 15.6±6 mL/min/kg during DDD-60 to 16.7±6 mL/min/kg during DDD-80, and p-NT-proBNP remained unchanged. The QoL score indicated that DDD-60 was better tolerated.
In CRT patients with non-ischemic heart failure, 3 months of DDD-80 pacing decreased sympathetic outflow (burst incidence only) compared to DDD-60 pacing. However, Qol scores were better during the lower pacing rate. Further and larger scale investigations are indicated.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02258061.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)期间的最佳起搏频率尚不清楚。因此,我们研究了改变基础起搏频率对自主神经功能、心肺运动能力和自我感知生活质量(QoL)的影响。
12例非缺血性心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会II-III级)的CRT患者参加了一项随机、双盲、交叉试验,其中基础起搏频率设定为DDD-60和DDD-80,持续3个月(2例患者为DDD-R)。在基线、3个月和6个月时,我们通过微神经ography(MSNA)、峰值耗氧量(pVO2)、N末端脑钠肽前体(p-NT-proBNP)、超声心动图和QoL评估交感神经活动。
与DDD-60相比,DDD-80起搏3个月使平均心率从77.3次/分钟增加到86.1次/分钟(p = 0.001),并降低了交感神经活动(51±14次爆发/100个心动周期 vs. 64±14次爆发/100个心动周期,p<0.05)。平均pVO2从DDD-60期间的15.6±6 mL/分钟/千克非显著增加到DDD-80期间的16.7±6 mL/分钟/千克,p-NT-proBNP保持不变。QoL评分表明DDD-60的耐受性更好。
在非缺血性心力衰竭的CRT患者中,与DDD-60起搏相比,3个月的DDD-80起搏降低了交感神经输出(仅爆发发生率)。然而,较低起搏频率期间的Qol评分更好。需要进一步进行更大规模的研究。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02258061。