Turan Burak, Daşlı Tolga, Erkol Ayhan, Erden İsmail
Cardiology Department, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Cardiology Department, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Oct-Nov;16(7):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
Sublingual (SL) nitroglycerin administered before radial artery puncture can improve cannulation success and decrease the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) compared with intra-arterial (IA) nitroglycerin in transradial procedures.
Patients undergoing diagnostic transradial angiography were randomized to IA (200 mcg) or SL (400 mcg) nitroglycerin. Primary endpoints were puncture time and puncture attempts. Secondary endpoint was the incidence of RAS.
Total of 101 participants (mean age 60±11years, 53% male) were randomized (51 in IA and 50 in SL groups). Puncture time (50 [36-75] vs 50 [35-90] sec), puncture attempts (1.18±0.48 vs 1.20±0.49), multiple punctures (13.7 vs 16.0%) and RAS (19.6 vs 24.0%) were not statistically different between IA vs SL groups respectively. A composite endpoint of all adverse events related to transradial angiography (multiple punctures, RAS, access site crossover, hypotension/bradycardia associated with nitroglycerin and radial artery occlusion) was very similar in IA vs SL groups (39 vs 40%, respectively). However puncture time was significantly longer with SL nitroglycerin in patients <1.65m height (47 [36-66] vs 63 [41-110] sec, p=0.042). Multiple punctures seemed higher with SL nitroglycerin in patients with diabetes (0 vs 30%, p=0.028) or in patients <1.65m height (7.4 vs 25%, p=0.085). Likewise, RAS with SL nitroglycerin seemed more frequent in smokers compared to IA nitroglycerin (0 vs 27%, p=0.089).
SL nitroglycerin was not different from IA nitroglycerin in terms of efficiency and safety in overall study population. However it may be inferior to IA nitroglycerin in certain subgroups (shorter individuals, diabetics and smokers).
在经桡动脉操作中,与动脉内(IA)给予硝酸甘油相比,桡动脉穿刺前舌下含服(SL)硝酸甘油可提高置管成功率并降低桡动脉痉挛(RAS)的发生率。
将接受诊断性经桡动脉血管造影的患者随机分为IA组(200微克)或SL组(400微克)硝酸甘油。主要终点为穿刺时间和穿刺次数。次要终点为RAS的发生率。
共有101名参与者(平均年龄60±11岁,53%为男性)被随机分组(IA组51名,SL组50名)。IA组与SL组之间的穿刺时间(50[36 - 75]秒对50[35 - 90]秒)、穿刺次数(1.18±0.48对1.20±0.49)、多次穿刺(13.7%对16.0%)和RAS(19.6%对24.0%)分别无统计学差异。IA组与SL组中与经桡动脉血管造影相关的所有不良事件(多次穿刺、RAS、穿刺部位交叉、与硝酸甘油相关的低血压/心动过缓和桡动脉闭塞)的复合终点非常相似(分别为39%对40%)。然而,身高<1.65米的患者使用SL硝酸甘油时穿刺时间显著更长(47[36 - 66]秒对63[41 - 110]秒,p = 0.042)。糖尿病患者(0对30%,p = 0.028)或身高<1.65米的患者(7.4%对25%,p = 0.085)使用SL硝酸甘油时多次穿刺似乎更高。同样,与IA硝酸甘油相比,吸烟者使用SL硝酸甘油时RAS似乎更频繁(0对27%,p = 0.089)。
在总体研究人群中,SL硝酸甘油在效率和安全性方面与IA硝酸甘油无异。然而,在某些亚组(身材较矮者、糖尿病患者和吸烟者)中,它可能不如IA硝酸甘油。