Warth A
Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Pathologe. 2015 Nov;36 Suppl 2:194-200. doi: 10.1007/s00292-015-0085-0.
Tumor diagnostics are based on histomorphology, immunohistochemistry and molecular pathological analysis of mutations, translocations and amplifications which are of diagnostic, prognostic and/or predictive value. In recent decades only histomorphology was used to classify lung cancer as either small (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although NSCLC was further subdivided in different entities; however, as no specific therapy options were available classification of specific subtypes was not clinically meaningful. This fundamentally changed with the discovery of specific molecular alterations in adenocarcinoma (ADC), e.g. mutations in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF or translocations of the ALK and ROS1 gene loci, which now form the basis of targeted therapies and have led to a significantly improved patient outcome. The diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value of imaging, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics as well as their interaction were systematically assessed in a large cohort with available clinical data including patient survival. Specific and sensitive diagnostic markers and marker panels were defined and diagnostic test algorithms for predictive biomarker assessment were optimized. It was demonstrated that the semi-quantitative assessment of ADC growth patterns is a stage-independent predictor of survival and is reproducibly applicable in the routine setting. Specific histomorphological characteristics correlated with computed tomography (CT) imaging features and thus allowed an improved interdisciplinary classification, especially in the preoperative or palliative setting. Moreover, specific molecular characteristics, for example BRAF mutations and the proliferation index (Ki-67) were identified as clinically relevant prognosticators. Comprehensive clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular assessment of NSCLCs allow an optimized patient stratification. Respective algorithms now form the backbone of the 2015 lung cancer World Health Organization (WHO) classification.
肿瘤诊断基于组织形态学、免疫组织化学以及对具有诊断、预后和/或预测价值的突变、易位和扩增的分子病理分析。近几十年来,仅依靠组织形态学将肺癌分为小细胞肺癌(SCLC)或非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),尽管NSCLC还可进一步细分为不同类型;然而,由于当时没有特定的治疗方案,特定亚型的分类在临床上并无实际意义。随着腺癌(ADC)中特定分子改变的发现,这种情况发生了根本性变化,例如KRAS、EGFR和BRAF基因的突变,或ALK和ROS1基因位点的易位,这些现在构成了靶向治疗的基础,并显著改善了患者的预后。在一个具有可用临床数据(包括患者生存情况)的大型队列中,系统评估了影像学、形态学、免疫组织化学和分子特征的诊断、预后和预测价值及其相互作用。定义了特异性和敏感性诊断标志物及标志物组合,并优化了用于预测生物标志物评估的诊断测试算法。结果表明,ADC生长模式的半定量评估是生存的分期独立预测指标,可在常规情况下重复应用。特定的组织形态学特征与计算机断层扫描(CT)成像特征相关,从而实现了更好的多学科分类,尤其是在术前或姑息治疗环境中。此外,特定的分子特征,如BRAF突变和增殖指数(Ki-67)被确定为具有临床相关性的预后指标。对NSCLC进行全面的临床、形态学、免疫组织化学和分子评估,可实现患者的优化分层。相应的算法现已成为2015年世界卫生组织(WHO)肺癌分类的核心内容。