Elbroch L Mark, Lendrum Patrick E, Quigley Howard, Caragiulo Anthony
Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street at Central Park West, New York, NY, 10024, USA.
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Mar;85(2):487-96. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12447. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
There are several alternative hypotheses about the effects of territoriality, kinship and prey availability on individual carnivore distributions within populations. The first is the land-tenure hypothesis, which predicts that carnivores regulate their density through territoriality and temporal avoidance. The second is the kinship hypothesis, which predicts related individuals will be clumped within populations, and the third is the resource dispersion hypothesis, which suggests that resource richness may explain variable sociality, spatial overlap or temporary aggregations of conspecifics. Research on the socio-spatial organization of animals is essential in understanding territoriality, intra- and interspecific competition, and contact rates that influence diverse ecology, including disease transmission between conspecifics and courtship behaviours. We explored these hypotheses with data collected on a solitary carnivore, the cougar (Puma concolor), from 2005 to 2012 in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem, Wyoming, USA. We employed 27 annual home ranges for 13 cougars to test whether home range overlap was better explained by land tenure, kinship, resource dispersion or some combination of the three. We found support for both the land tenure and resource dispersion hypotheses, but not for kinship. Cougar sex was the primary driver explaining variation in home range overlap. Males overlapped significantly with females, whereas the remaining dyads (F-F, M-M) overlapped significantly less. In support for the resource dispersion hypothesis, hunting opportunity (the probability of a cougar killing prey in a given location) was often higher in overlapping than in non-overlapping portions of cougar home ranges. In particular, winter hunt opportunity rather than summer hunt opportunity was higher in overlapping portions of female-female and male-female home ranges. Our results may indicate that solitary carnivores are more tolerant of sharing key resources with unrelated conspecifics than previously believed, or at least during periods of high resource availability. Further, our results suggest that the resource dispersion hypothesis, which is typically applied to social species, is applicable in describing the spatial organization of solitary carnivores.
关于领地性、亲缘关系和猎物可获得性对种群内个体食肉动物分布的影响,存在几种不同的假说。第一种是土地占有假说,该假说预测食肉动物通过领地性和时间回避来调节其密度。第二种是亲缘关系假说,该假说预测相关个体在种群内会聚集在一起,第三种是资源分散假说,该假说认为资源丰富度可以解释同种个体的可变社会性、空间重叠或临时聚集。对动物社会空间组织的研究对于理解领地性、种内和种间竞争以及影响多种生态的接触率至关重要,包括同种个体之间的疾病传播和求偶行为。我们利用2005年至2012年在美国怀俄明州黄石南部生态系统收集的关于独居食肉动物美洲狮(美洲狮)的数据,对这些假说进行了探索。我们采用了13只美洲狮的27个年度家域来测试家域重叠是否能更好地由土地占有、亲缘关系、资源分散或这三者的某种组合来解释。我们发现土地占有假说和资源分散假说都得到了支持,但亲缘关系假说未得到支持。美洲狮的性别是解释家域重叠变化的主要驱动因素。雄性与雌性的重叠显著,而其余配对(雌性 - 雌性、雄性 - 雄性)的重叠则显著较少。为支持资源分散假说,在美洲狮家域的重叠部分,狩猎机会(美洲狮在给定位置捕杀猎物的概率)通常高于非重叠部分。特别是在雌性 - 雌性和雄性 - 雌性家域的重叠部分,冬季狩猎机会而非夏季狩猎机会更高。我们的结果可能表明,独居食肉动物比之前认为的更能容忍与无亲缘关系的同种个体共享关键资源,或者至少在资源可用性高的时期是这样。此外,我们的结果表明,通常应用于群居物种的资源分散假说也适用于描述独居食肉动物的空间组织。