Declerck Paul, Mellstedt Håkan, Danese Silvio
a a Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences , KU Leuven, University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
b b Cancer Centre Karolinska, Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna , Stockholm , Sweden.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2325-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1098601. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
The impending expiry of the patent on a number of leading biologic drugs has led to a surge in the development of 'biosimilar' or 'follow-on' products. However, in contrast to generic small-molecule medicines, biosimilars are not identical to their reference products. The differences and complexities surrounding both the molecular structure and the manufacturing process for biologics and biosimilars have resulted in a lack of clarity regarding the terms used in different parts of the world to define various aspects of development and utilization such as regulatory approval, pharmacovigilance, interchangeability and treatment-naivety. This makes quantitative evaluation of biosimilars a great challenge to both the scientific community and regulatory agencies. This manuscript attempts to clarify the terms used and address an important knowledge gap which is currently resulting in an increasing rush to position biosimilars for certain indications and patients in the absence of agreed upon definitions.
多种领先生物制剂药物的专利即将到期,这导致了“生物类似药”或“后续产品”的开发热潮。然而,与普通小分子药物不同,生物类似药与其参照产品并不完全相同。生物制剂和生物类似药在分子结构和生产工艺方面存在的差异和复杂性,导致世界各地在用于定义开发和使用各个方面(如监管批准、药物警戒、可互换性和初治情况)的术语上缺乏明确性。这使得对生物类似药进行定量评估对科学界和监管机构来说都是一项巨大挑战。本文试图厘清所使用的术语,并填补一个重要的知识空白,目前由于缺乏商定的定义,导致在没有明确界定的情况下,急于将生物类似药用于某些适应症和患者群体。