Maguire David R, Gerak Lisa R, France Charles P
Departments of aPharmacology bPsychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Behav Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;27(2-3 Spec Issue):155-64. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000194.
Opioid abusers discount delayed reinforcers more rapidly than nonusers; however, it is unclear whether chronic drug administration or its discontinuation impacts discounting. This study examined the impact of daily morphine administration and its discontinuation on delay discounting of food in rhesus monkeys. Responding on one lever delivered one food pellet immediately; responding on another lever delivered two food pellets either immediately or after a delay (30-120 s) that increased within the session. Monkeys (n=3) responded for the large reinforcer when both reinforcers were delivered immediately and more for the smaller, immediately available reinforcer as the delay to delivery of the large reinforcer increased. When administered acutely, morphine (0.032-5.6 mg/kg) increased trial omissions and had variable effects on choice, with small doses decreasing and large doses increasing choice of the large delayed reinforcer. Chronic morphine administration (0.1 mg/kg/day to 3.2 mg/kg twice daily) reduced choice of the large delayed reinforcer in two monkeys, while increasing choice in a third monkey. Despite the development of tolerance to some effects (i.e. rightward shifts in dose-effect curves for the number of trials omitted) and evidence of mild opioid dependence (e.g. decrease in the number of trials completed, as well as body weight), discontinuation of treatment did not appear to systematically impact discounting. Overall, these results suggest that repeated opioid administration causes persistent effects on choice under a delay discounting procedure; however, differences in the direction of effect among individuals suggest that factors other than, or in addition to, changes in discounting might play a role.
阿片类药物滥用者比非滥用者更快地低估延迟强化物;然而,尚不清楚长期药物给药或停药是否会影响折扣。本研究考察了每日给予吗啡及其停药对恒河猴食物延迟折扣的影响。在一个杠杆上做出反应可立即获得一粒食物颗粒;在另一个杠杆上做出反应可立即或在延迟(30 - 120秒)后获得两粒食物颗粒,延迟时间在实验过程中会增加。当两种强化物都立即给予时,猴子(n = 3)会为大强化物做出反应,并且随着大强化物延迟交付时间的增加,对较小的、即时可得的强化物反应更多。急性给予吗啡(0.032 - 5.6毫克/千克)会增加实验遗漏次数,对选择有不同影响,小剂量会减少、大剂量会增加对大延迟强化物的选择。长期给予吗啡(0.1毫克/千克/天至3.2毫克/千克,每日两次)使两只猴子减少了对大延迟强化物的选择,而第三只猴子的选择增加。尽管对某些效应产生了耐受性(即实验遗漏次数的剂量 - 效应曲线向右移动)且有轻度阿片类药物依赖的证据(如完成的实验次数减少以及体重下降),但停药似乎并未系统性地影响折扣。总体而言,这些结果表明,在延迟折扣程序下,重复给予阿片类药物会对选择产生持续影响;然而,个体间效应方向的差异表明,除了折扣变化之外或之外的其他因素可能也起作用。