Walsh Erika, Illing Elisa, Riley Kristen O, Cure Joel, Srubiski Aviva, Harvey Richard J, Woodworth Bradford A
Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Sep;76(5):385-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1551668. Epub 2015 May 15.
Objective The nasoseptal flap (NSF) provides vascularized tissue for repair of skull base defects of various etiologies. However, the NSF repair after skull base resection for anterior cranial base malignancies may demonstrate radiologic findings confusing for recurrent or residual disease on postoperative surveillance imaging. The objective of the current study was to review neuroradiologic misinterpretations of NSF reconstruction following anterior cranial base malignancies. Methods A multicenter review of patients reconstructed with the NSF after endoscopic resection of anterior cranial base malignancies from 2008 to 2013 was performed. Data were collected regarding etiology, surgical technique, locoregional control, and postoperative radiologic assessments. Only patients with at least one postoperative surveillance scan with inaccurate assessment of residual or recurrent malignancy were included in the study. Results Over 5 years, 13 patients were identified who had erroneous reporting of malignancy due to NSF reconstruction. On average, two neuroradiologists interpreted the NSF as persistent or recurrent malignancy over this time period (range: 1-7). The key findings suspicious for recurrence were enhancement and soft tissue thickening of the NSF. These findings were present in at least one postoperative scan in all patients. Conclusion Neuroradiologists and rhinologists performing surveillance on patients with a history of skull base malignancy with NSF reconstruction should maintain collaborative efforts to accurately interpret radiologic findings of the NSF during postoperative imaging.
鼻中隔瓣(NSF)可为各种病因导致的颅底缺损修复提供带血管组织。然而,前颅底恶性肿瘤行颅底切除术后进行NSF修复时,术后监测影像上可能会出现一些混淆复发或残留疾病的影像学表现。本研究的目的是回顾前颅底恶性肿瘤后NSF重建的神经放射学误判情况。方法:对2008年至2013年在内镜下切除前颅底恶性肿瘤后采用NSF重建的患者进行多中心回顾性研究。收集有关病因、手术技术、局部区域控制和术后放射学评估的数据。本研究仅纳入至少有一次术后监测扫描对残留或复发性恶性肿瘤评估不准确的患者。结果:在5年多的时间里,共确定了13例因NSF重建而出现恶性肿瘤错误报告的患者。在此期间,平均有两名神经放射科医生将NSF解读为持续性或复发性恶性肿瘤(范围:1 - 7名)。怀疑复发的关键表现为NSF强化和软组织增厚。所有患者的至少一次术后扫描中均出现了这些表现。结论:对有颅底恶性肿瘤病史且行NSF重建的患者进行监测的神经放射科医生和鼻科医生应共同努力,在术后影像学检查中准确解读NSF的放射学表现。