Suppr超能文献

使用口服砷剂联合全反式维甲酸作为急性早幼粒细胞白血病一线治疗方案时可降低医疗成本并缩短住院天数。

Reduced medical costs and hospital days when using oral arsenic plus ATRA as the first-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia.

作者信息

Jiang Hao, Liang Gong-Wen, Huang Xiao-Jun, Jiang Qian, Han Sheng, Shi Lu-Wen, Zhu Hong-Hu

机构信息

Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100044, China.

Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Leuk Res. 2015 Dec;39(12):1319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Abstract

We have demonstrated that oral arsenic (Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula, RIF) plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is not inferior to intravenous arsenic trioxide (ATO) plus ATRA as the first-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). To compare the cost-effectiveness of oral and intravenous arsenic, we analyzed the results of 30 patients in each group involved in a randomized controlled trial at our center. The median total medical costs were $13,183.49 in the RIF group compared with $24136.98 in the ATO group (p<0.0001). This difference primarily resulted from the different costs of induction therapy (p=0.016) and maintenance treatment (p<0.0001). The length of hospitalization for the RIF group was significantly lower than that for the ATO group (24 vs. 31 days, p<0.0001) during induction therapy. During maintenance treatment, the estimated medical costs were $2047.14 for each patient in the RIF group treated at home compared with $11273.81 for each patient in the ATO group treated in an outpatient setting (p<0.0001). We conclude that oral RIF plus ATRA significantly reduced the medical costs and length of hospital stay during induction and remission therapy compared with ATO plus ATRA in APL patients.

摘要

我们已经证明,口服砷剂(雄黄-靛蓝天然配方,RIF)联合全反式维甲酸(ATRA)作为急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的一线治疗方案并不逊色于静脉注射三氧化二砷(ATO)联合ATRA。为比较口服和静脉注射砷剂的成本效益,我们分析了本中心一项随机对照试验中每组30例患者的结果。RIF组的总医疗费用中位数为13183.49美元,而ATO组为24136.98美元(p<0.0001)。这种差异主要源于诱导治疗(p=0.016)和维持治疗(p<0.0001)的不同成本。诱导治疗期间,RIF组的住院时间显著低于ATO组(24天对31天,p<0.0001)。在维持治疗期间,RIF组在家治疗的每位患者估计医疗费用为2047.14美元,而ATO组在门诊治疗的每位患者为11273.81美元(p<0.0001)。我们得出结论,与ATO联合ATRA相比,口服RIF联合ATRA在APL患者的诱导和缓解治疗期间显著降低了医疗成本和住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验