Cerón-Zapata A M, López-Palacio A M, Rodriguez-Ardila M J, Berrio-Gutiérrez L M, De Menezes M, Sforza C
Pediatric Dentistry and Preventive Orthodontics, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
Comprehensive Dentistry for Children, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Feb;43(2):111-8. doi: 10.1111/joor.12350. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
To compare the three-dimensional changes occurring in the maxillary arch during the use of modified pre-surgical nasoalveolar moulding (PNAM) and Hotz's plate. A clinical trial including 32 children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), 16 treated with Hotz's plate and 16 with PNAM, was performed. Impressions of the maxillary arches were taken: A. prior to pre-surgical orthopaedics, B. before cheiloplasty and C. after cheiloplasty. Models were digitised using a stereophotogrammetric instrument, and geodesic distances were calculated: anterior, canine and posterior widths of the arch, and lengths and cleft depths of the larger and shorter segments. The time and treatment effects were assessed by two-factor anova. A significant effect of treatment was found for cleft depth at the larger segment: children treated with Hotz's plate had significantly deeper cleft than children treated with PNAM. All distances significantly changed during time: the anterior and canine widths decreased, while the posterior width, the lengths and depths of the cleft segments increased. Significant treatment per time interactions was found. The anterior and canine widths reduced more with PNAM between time points A and B while Hotz's treatment was more effective between B and C. The shorter segment depth increased more between B and C with PNAM, and between A and B with Hotz's plate. During pre-surgical orthopaedics, therapy with PNAM obtained the best results in reducing the width at the anterior segment of the cleft. This treatment gave a lower increase in cleft depth than treatment with Hotz's plate.
比较改良术前鼻牙槽塑形(PNAM)和霍茨板在使用过程中上颌牙弓发生的三维变化。进行了一项临床试验,纳入32名单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)儿童,其中16名采用霍茨板治疗,16名采用PNAM治疗。获取上颌牙弓的印模:A.术前正畸治疗前;B.唇裂修复术前;C.唇裂修复术后。使用立体摄影测量仪器对模型进行数字化处理,并计算测地线距离:牙弓的前部、尖牙和后部宽度,以及较大和较短节段的长度和裂隙深度。通过双因素方差分析评估时间和治疗效果。发现治疗对较大节段的裂隙深度有显著影响:采用霍茨板治疗的儿童裂隙明显比采用PNAM治疗的儿童深。所有距离在不同时间均有显著变化:前部和尖牙宽度减小,而后部宽度、裂隙节段的长度和深度增加。发现了显著的治疗与时间交互作用。在时间点A和B之间,PNAM使前部和尖牙宽度减小得更多,而霍茨板治疗在B和C之间更有效。较短节段深度在B和C之间采用PNAM时增加更多,在A和B之间采用霍茨板时增加更多。在术前正畸治疗期间,PNAM治疗在减少裂隙前部宽度方面取得了最佳效果。与霍茨板治疗相比,这种治疗使裂隙深度增加幅度更小。