Tagami Takashi, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;62(1):60-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ763. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
The use of prophylactic antibiotics for severe burns in general settings remains controversial and is not suggested by recent guidelines owing to lack of evidence for efficacy. We examined the hypothesis that prophylactic systemic antibiotic therapy may reduce mortality in patients with severe burns.
We identified 2893 severe burns patients (burn index ≥ 10) treated at 583 hospitals between July 2010 and March 2013 using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination inpatient database. We categorized the patients according to whether they received mechanical ventilation within 2 days after admission (n = 692) or not (n = 2201). We further divided the patients into those with and without prophylactic antibiotics and generated 232 and 526 propensity score-matched pairs, respectively. We evaluated 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality.
Among the mechanically ventilated patients, significant differences in 28-day in-hospital mortality existed between control and prophylaxis groups in both unmatched (control vs prophylaxis; 48.6% vs 38.3%; difference, 10.2%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.7 to 17.7) and propensity score-matched groups (47.0% vs 36.6%; difference, 10.3%; 95% CI, 1.4 to 19.3). Among patients without mechanical ventilation, there was no significant difference in 28-day in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups in both the unmatched (control vs prophylaxis; 7.0% vs 5.8%; difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -1.2 to 3.5) and propensity-matched groups (5.1% vs 4.2%; difference, 0.9%; 95% CI, -1.6 to 3.5).
Prophylactic antibiotics use may result in improved 28-day in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with severe burns but not in those who do not receive mechanical ventilation.
在一般情况下,对于严重烧伤患者使用预防性抗生素仍存在争议,且由于缺乏疗效证据,近期指南不建议使用。我们检验了预防性全身抗生素治疗可能降低严重烧伤患者死亡率的假设。
我们使用日本诊断程序组合住院患者数据库,确定了2010年7月至2013年3月期间在583家医院接受治疗的2893例严重烧伤患者(烧伤指数≥10)。我们根据患者入院后2天内是否接受机械通气将其分类(n = 692)或未接受机械通气(n = 2201)。我们进一步将患者分为接受和未接受预防性抗生素的两组,并分别生成了232对和526对倾向得分匹配对。我们评估了28天全因院内死亡率。
在机械通气患者中,未匹配组(对照组与预防组;48.6%对38.3%;差异,10.2%;95%置信区间[95%CI],2.7至17.7)和倾向得分匹配组(47.0%对36.6%;差异,10.3%;95%CI,1.4至19.3)中,对照组和预防组的28天院内死亡率存在显著差异。在未接受机械通气的患者中,未匹配组(对照组与预防组;7.0%对5.8%;差异,1.2%;95%CI,-1.2至3.5)和倾向得分匹配组(5.1%对4.2%;差异,0.9%;95%CI,-1.6至3.5)中,两组的28天院内死亡率无显著差异。
预防性使用抗生素可能会提高严重烧伤且接受机械通气患者的28天院内死亡率,但对于未接受机械通气的患者则不然。