Braamhorst Wouter, Lobbestael Jill, Emons Wilco H M, Arntz Arnoud, Witteman Cilia L M, Bekker Marrie H J
*Mental Health Institute Reinier van Arkel, 's-Hertogenbosch; †Maastricht University; ‡Tilburg University; §University of Amsterdam; and ∥Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Oct;203(10):804-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000371.
This study investigated sex bias in the classification of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. A sample of psychologists in training for a post-master degree (N = 180) read brief case histories (male or female version) and made DSM classification. To differentiate sex bias due to sex stereotyping or to base rate variation, we used different case histories, respectively: (1) non-ambiguous case histories with enough criteria of either borderline or narcissistic personality disorder to meet the threshold for classification, and (2) an ambiguous case with subthreshold features of both borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. Results showed significant differences due to sex of the patient in the ambiguous condition. Thus, when the diagnosis is not straightforward, as in the case of mixed subthreshold features, sex bias is present and is influenced by base-rate variation. These findings emphasize the need for caution in classifying personality disorders, especially borderline or narcissistic traits.
本研究调查了边缘型和自恋型人格障碍分类中的性别偏见。一个由正在攻读硕士后学位的心理学家组成的样本(N = 180)阅读了简短的病例史(男性或女性版本)并进行了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)分类。为了区分因性别刻板印象或基础比率变化导致的性别偏见,我们分别使用了不同的病例史:(1)具有足够边缘型或自恋型人格障碍标准以达到分类阈值的明确病例史,以及(2)具有边缘型和自恋型人格障碍亚阈值特征的模糊病例。结果显示,在模糊条件下,患者性别存在显著差异。因此,当诊断不明确时,如在具有混合亚阈值特征的情况下,存在性别偏见且受基础比率变化的影响。这些发现强调了在对人格障碍进行分类时,尤其是对边缘型或自恋型特征进行分类时需要谨慎。