Lee Chang Kyu, Shin Dong Ah, Yi Seong, Kim Keung Nyun, Shin Hyun Chul, Yoon Do Heum, Ha Yoon
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine; and.
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):100-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).
Fifty consecutive patients who underwent a cervical laminoplasty for OPLL between January 2012 and January 2013 and who were followed up for at least 1 year were analyzed in this study. Standing plain radiographs of the cervical spine, CT (midsagittal view), and MRI (T2-weighted sagittal view) were obtained (anteroposterior, lateral, flexion, and extension) pre- and postoperatively. Cervical spine alignment was assessed with the following 3 parameters: the C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T-1 slope minus C2-7 Cobb angle. The change in cervical sagittal alignment was defined as the difference between the post- and preoperative C2-7 Cobb angles, C2-7 SVAs, and T-1 slope minus C2-7 Cobb angles. Outcome assessments (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Neck Disability Index [NDI], 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], and Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores) were obtained in all patients pre- and postoperatively.
The average patient age was 56.3 years (range 38-72 years). There were 34 male patients and 16 female patients. Cervical laminoplasty for OPLL helped alleviate radiculomyelopathy. Compared with the preoperative scores, improvement was seen in postoperative VAS and JOA scores. After laminoplasty, 35 patients had kyphotic changes, and 15 had lordotic changes. However, cervical sagittal alignment after laminoplasty was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative improvement of the JOA score (C2-7 Cobb angle: p = 0.633; C2-7 SVA: p = 0.817; T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis: p = 0.554), the SF-36 score (C2-7 Cobb angle: p = 0.554; C2-7 SVA: p = 0.793; T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis: p = 0.829), the VAS neck score (C2-7 Cobb angle: p = 0.263; C2-7 SVA: p = 0.716; T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis: p = 0.497), or the NDI score (C2-7 Cobb angle: p = 0.568; C2-7 SVA: p = 0.279; T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis: p = 0.966). Similarly, the change in cervical sagittal alignment was not related to the JOA (p = 0.604), SF-36 (p = 0.308), VAS neck (p = 0.832), or NDI (p = 0.608) scores.
Cervical laminoplasty for OPLL improved radiculomyelopathy. Cervical laminoplasty increased the probability of cervical kyphotic alignment. However, cervical sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes were not clearly related.
本研究的目的是确定后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者颈椎矢状位对线与颈椎椎板成形术后临床疗效之间的关系。
本研究分析了2012年1月至2013年1月期间连续50例行颈椎椎板成形术治疗OPLL且随访至少1年的患者。术前和术后均获取颈椎正侧位、屈伸位的X线平片、CT(矢状位)及MRI(T2加权矢状位)。采用以下3个参数评估颈椎对线情况:C2-7 Cobb角、C2-7矢状垂直轴(SVA)以及T1斜率减去C2-7 Cobb角。颈椎矢状位对线的变化定义为术后与术前C2-7 Cobb角、C2-7 SVA以及T1斜率减去C2-7 Cobb角的差值。所有患者术前和术后均进行疗效评估(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]、Oswestry颈部功能障碍指数[NDI]、36项简明健康调查问卷[SF-36]以及日本骨科协会[JOA]评分)。
患者平均年龄为56.3岁(范围38-72岁)。男性患者34例,女性患者16例。OPLL颈椎椎板成形术有助于缓解神经根型脊髓病。与术前评分相比,术后VAS和JOA评分有所改善。椎板成形术后,35例患者出现后凸改变,15例出现前凸改变。然而,就术后JOA评分的改善而言(C2-7 Cobb角:p = 0.633;C2-7 SVA:p = 0.817;T1斜率减去C2-7前凸:p = 0.554),颈椎椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位对线与临床疗效无显著相关性;SF-36评分(C2-7 Cobb角:p = 0.554;C2-7 SVA:p = 0.793;T1斜率减去C2-7前凸:p = 0.829)、VAS颈部评分(C2-7 Cobb角:p = 0.263;C2-7 SVA:p = 0.716;T1斜率减去C2-7前凸:p = 0.497)或NDI评分(C2-7 Cobb角:p = 0.568;C2-7 SVA:p = 0.279;T1斜率减去C2-7前凸:p = 0.966)亦是如此。同样,颈椎矢状位对线的变化与JOA评分(p = 0.604)、SF-36评分(p = 0.308)、VAS颈部评分(p = 0.832)或NDI评分(p = 0.608)无关。
OPLL颈椎椎板成形术改善了神经根型脊髓病。颈椎椎板成形术增加了颈椎后凸对线的可能性。然而,颈椎矢状位对线与临床疗效并无明确关联。