Dunn Jenny C, Hamer Keith C, Benton Tim G
School of Biology, Irene Manton Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0139492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139492. eCollection 2015.
Land management intrinsically influences the distribution of animals and can consequently alter the potential for density-dependent processes to act within populations. For declining species, high densities of breeding territories are typically considered to represent productive populations. However, as density-dependent effects of food limitation or predator pressure may occur (especially when species are dependent upon separate nesting and foraging habitats), high territory density may limit per-capita productivity. Here, we use a declining but widespread European farmland bird, the yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella L., as a model system to test whether higher territory densities result in lower fledging success, parental provisioning rates or nestling growth rates compared to lower densities. Organic landscapes held higher territory densities, but nests on organic farms fledged fewer nestlings, translating to a 5 times higher rate of population shrinkage on organic farms compared to conventional. In addition, when parental provisioning behaviour was not restricted by predation risk (i.e., at times of low corvid activity), nestling provisioning rates were higher at lower territory densities, resulting in a much greater increase in nestling mass in low density areas, suggesting that food limitation occurred at high densities. These findings in turn suggest an ecological trap, whereby preferred nesting habitat does not provide sufficient food for rearing nestlings at high population density, creating a population sink. Habitat management for farmland birds should focus not simply on creating a high nesting density, but also on ensuring heterogeneous habitats to provide food resources in close proximity to nesting birds, even if this occurs through potentially restricting overall nest density but increasing population-level breeding success.
土地管理本质上会影响动物的分布,进而可能改变种群内部密度依赖过程发挥作用的可能性。对于数量下降的物种,通常认为高密度的繁殖领地代表着有繁殖力的种群。然而,由于可能会出现食物限制或捕食压力的密度依赖效应(特别是当物种依赖于单独的筑巢和觅食栖息地时),高领地密度可能会限制人均繁殖力。在这里,我们以数量正在下降但分布广泛的欧洲农田鸟类黄鹀(Emberiza citrinella L.)作为模型系统,来测试与较低密度相比,较高的领地密度是否会导致雏鸟成活率、亲鸟育雏率或雏鸟生长率降低。有机景观中的领地密度更高,但有机农场中的巢穴孵出的雏鸟数量更少,这意味着有机农场的种群收缩率比传统农场高5倍。此外,当亲鸟的育雏行为不受捕食风险限制时(即鸦科动物活动较少的时候),较低领地密度下的雏鸟育雏率更高,导致低密度区域雏鸟体重增加幅度更大,这表明高密度时存在食物限制。这些发现进而表明存在一种生态陷阱,即首选的筑巢栖息地在高种群密度时无法为育雏提供足够的食物,从而形成种群汇。农田鸟类的栖息地管理不应仅仅侧重于创造高筑巢密度,还应侧重于确保栖息地多样化,以便在筑巢鸟类附近提供食物资源,即使这可能需要通过潜在地限制总体巢穴密度但提高种群水平的繁殖成功率来实现。