Suppr超能文献

原发性和继发性肝脏恶性肿瘤经动脉治疗后的临床及影像随访实践:一项在线调查结果

Clinical and Imaging Follow-up Practices after Transarterial Therapy for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies: Results of an Online Survey.

作者信息

Gaba Ron C, Baerlocher Mark O, Nikolic Boris, Venkatesan Aradhana M, Lewandowski Robert J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor St, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612.

Department of Radiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To characterize practices and quantify variation in longitudinal follow-up approaches among interventional radiologists (IRs) after liver transarterial locoregional therapy (LRT) in contemporary Interventional Oncology practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In November/December 2014, Society of Interventional Radiology members were invited to participate in a survey regarding clinical and imaging follow-up of liver cancer patients treated with transarterial LRT. On survey closure, responses were compiled and analyzed.

RESULTS

The 30-item survey response rate was 11% (361 of 3290). Respondents were predominantly American IRs (311 of 355, 88%) who perform 1-5 LRTs monthly (196 of 354, 55%). Most (305 of 336, 91%) IRs reported longitudinal follow-up, with patient encounters within 1-month (73%, 211 of 290) postprocedure and every 3 months (68%, 196 of 287) thereafter and involvement in imaging (up to 80%, 235 of 290) ordering and evaluation. Preferred timing of first follow-up imaging (1 month vs. 3 months) and response criteria used (mRECIST favored) varied.

CONCLUSIONS

Although IRs are actively involved in clinical and imaging follow-up of patients with liver malignancies treated with transarterial LRTs, there are differences in imaging frequency and response assessment. These data may serve as a starting point for standardization of LRT follow-up.

摘要

原理与目的

在当代介入肿瘤学实践中,描述肝动脉局部区域治疗(LRT)后介入放射科医生(IR)的纵向随访方法,并量化其差异。

材料与方法

2014年11月/12月,邀请介入放射学会成员参与一项关于经动脉LRT治疗的肝癌患者临床和影像随访的调查。调查结束后,对回复进行整理和分析。

结果

30项调查的回复率为11%(3290份中的361份)。受访者主要是美国的介入放射科医生(355份中的311份,88%),他们每月进行1 - 5次LRT(354份中的196份,55%)。大多数(336份中的305份,91%)介入放射科医生报告进行纵向随访,术后1个月内(73%,290份中的211份)有患者就诊,此后每3个月(68%,287份中的196份)就诊一次,并参与影像(高达80%,290份中的235份)检查的安排和评估。首次随访影像的首选时间(1个月与3个月)以及所使用的反应标准(更倾向于mRECIST)各不相同。

结论

尽管介入放射科医生积极参与经动脉LRT治疗的肝恶性肿瘤患者的临床和影像随访,但在影像检查频率和反应评估方面存在差异。这些数据可作为LRT随访标准化的起点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验