Suppr超能文献

四种乳腺癌筛查成像仪器的比较效能

Comparative Efficacy of Four Imaging Instruments for Breast Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Mehnati Parinaz, Tirtash Maede Jafari

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran E-mail :

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6177-86. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6177.

Abstract

Sensitivity and specificity are the two most important indicators in selection of medical imaging devices for cancer screening. Breast images taken by conventional or digital mammography, ultrasound, MRI and optical mammography were collected from 2,143,852 patients. They were then studied and compared for sensitivity and specificity results. Optical mammography had the highest sensitivity (p<0.001 and p<0.006) except with MRI. Digital mammography had the highest specificity for breast cancer imaging. A comparison of specificity between digital mammography and optical mammography was significant (p<0.021). If two or more breast diagnostic imaging tests are requested the overall sensitivity and specificity will increase. In this literature review study patients at high-risk of breast cancer were studied beside normal or sensitive women. The image modality performance of each breast test was compared for each.

摘要

敏感性和特异性是癌症筛查医学成像设备选择中两个最重要的指标。从2143852名患者中收集了通过传统或数字乳腺摄影、超声、磁共振成像(MRI)和光学乳腺摄影拍摄的乳腺图像。然后对这些图像进行研究,并比较其敏感性和特异性结果。除了MRI外,光学乳腺摄影具有最高的敏感性(p<0.001和p<0.006)。数字乳腺摄影对乳腺癌成像具有最高的特异性。数字乳腺摄影和光学乳腺摄影之间的特异性比较具有显著性(p<0.021)。如果要求进行两项或更多项乳腺诊断成像检查,总体敏感性和特异性将会提高。在这项文献综述研究中,除了正常或敏感的女性外,还对乳腺癌高危患者进行了研究。对每项乳腺检查的图像模态性能进行了逐一比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验