Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1551-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13692. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
To analyse the associations between delivery mode and symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a cohort of symptomatic women.
Retrospective observational study.
A total of 1258 consecutive women attending a tertiary urogynaecological unit for the investigation of lower urinary tract or pelvic floor disorders between January 2012 and December 2014.
Obstetric history and clinical examination data were obtained from the unit database. Prolapse quantification on imaging was performed using stored four-dimensional translabial ultrasound volume data sets. Women were grouped into four groups according to the most traumatic delivery reported. The presence of symptoms and signs of POP were compared between delivery groups while controlling for potential confounders.
Prolapse symptoms, visual analogue score for prolapse bother, International Continence Society Prolapse Quantification System findings and ultrasound findings of anterior, central and posterior compartment descent.
Nulliparae showed the lowest prevalence of most measures of POP, followed by women exclusively delivered by caesarean section. Highest prevalences were consistently found in women delivered at least once by forceps, although the differences between this group and women delivered by normal vaginal delivery and/or vacuum extraction were significant in three out of eight measures only. Compared with women in the caesarean section group, the adjusted odds ratios for reporting symptoms of prolapse were 2.4 (95% CI 1.30-4.59) and 3.2 (95% CI 1.65-6.12) in the normal vaginal delivery/vacuum extraction group and forceps group, respectively.
There is a clear link between vaginal delivery and symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse in urogynaecological patients.
Compared with caesarean section a history of vaginal delivery more than doubles the risk for POP.
分析队列中症状性女性的分娩方式与盆腔器官脱垂(POP)症状和体征之间的关系。
回顾性观察性研究。
共有 1258 名连续就诊于三级尿妇科单位以调查下尿路或盆底功能障碍的女性,就诊时间为 2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月。
从单位数据库中获取产科病史和临床检查数据。使用存储的四维经阴道超声容积数据集进行脱垂定量。根据报告的最具创伤性分娩方式将女性分为四组。在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下,比较分娩组之间 POP 症状和体征的存在情况。
脱垂症状、脱垂困扰的视觉模拟评分、国际尿控协会脱垂定量系统发现以及前、中、后盆腔下降的超声发现。
初产妇 POP 各种指标的患病率最低,其次是仅行剖宫产的女性。在至少一次行产钳助产分娩的女性中,患病率始终最高,但在八项指标中的三项中,该组与仅行阴道分娩和/或真空抽吸分娩的女性之间的差异具有统计学意义。与剖宫产组相比,阴道分娩/真空抽吸分娩组报告脱垂症状的调整比值比分别为 2.4(95%CI 1.30-4.59)和 3.2(95%CI 1.65-6.12),产钳助产分娩组。
在妇科患者中,阴道分娩与盆腔器官脱垂的症状和体征之间存在明确联系。
与剖宫产相比,阴道分娩史使 POP 的风险增加一倍以上。