Suppr超能文献

通过常规或逐步减量方法限制牛奶喂养,并在开食料中添加或不添加粗饲料,对荷斯坦公牛犊生长性能的影响。

The effect of restricted milk feeding through conventional or step-down methods with or without forage provision in starter feed on performance of Holstein bull calves.

作者信息

Daneshvar D, Khorvash M, Ghasemi E, Mahdavi A H, Moshiri B, Mirzaei M, Pezeshki A, Ghaffari M H

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):3979-89. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8863.

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to examine whether step-down (STP) milk feeding method together with forage provision would improve performance, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolites, and structural growth of calves. Holstein bull calves ( = 40) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Treatments were 1) conventional (COV) milk feeding without forage provision (COV-NF), 2) COV milk feeding with forage provision, 3) STP milk feeding without forage provision, and 4) STP milk feeding with forage provision. Calves in the COV method ( = 20) received 5.5 L/d milk until d 56 of age followed by 2 L/d milk from d 56 to 59 of age. Calves in the STP method ( = 20) received 7 L/d milk until d 35, 4 L/d milk from d 35 to 48, and 2 L/d milk from d 50 to 59 of age. All the calves received the starter ration from d 3 of the study until d 74 of age. Forage-supplemented calves ( = 10/milk feeding method) received 15% alfalfa hay mixed with finely ground starter as a total mixed ration. All calves were weaned on d 60 of age and remained in the study until d 74. Regardless of the milk feeding method, the final BW (92.54 vs. 83.14 kg/d), starter intake (0.90 vs. 0.65 kg/d), total DMI (1.43 vs. 1.17 kg/d), and ADG (0.73 vs. 0.60 kg/d) were greater ( < 0.01) in forage-supplemented calves than those that received no forage during the preweaning, postweaning, and overall periods. Milk feeding method had no effect on ruminal pH, total VFA, acetate, or acetate:propionate ratio as well as body measurements. Ruminal pH and the molar proportions of acetate were greater ( < 0.05) in the forage-supplemented calves than those that received no forage during the pre- and postweaning periods. Regardless of forage provision, STP methods increased ( < 0.05) the postweaning numbers of monocytes and lymphocytes. Overall, there was no interaction between milk feeding methods and forage provision with respect to BW, DMI, G:F, apparent nutrient digestibility (DM, OM, and CP), and body measurements. The interaction of milk feeding method and forage provision was significant for the rumen concentration of butyrate ( < 0.05), with the highest concentration for the COV-NF treatment on d 35 of the study. In conclusion, independent of the milk feeding method, inclusion of 15% alfalfa hay in starter diets enhances the performance of dairy calves.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验逐步减量(STP)喂奶方法与提供粗饲料是否会改善犊牛的生长性能、瘤胃发酵、养分消化率、血液代谢物以及身体结构生长。40头荷斯坦公牛犊采用2×2析因设计的完全随机分组方式,随机分配到4种处理中的1种。处理方式分别为:1)不提供粗饲料的传统(COV)喂奶方式(COV-NF);2)提供粗饲料的COV喂奶方式;3)不提供粗饲料的STP喂奶方式;4)提供粗饲料的STP喂奶方式。采用COV方法的犊牛(n = 20)在56日龄前每天摄入5.5升牛奶,56至59日龄每天摄入2升牛奶。采用STP方法的犊牛(n = 20)在35日龄前每天摄入7升牛奶,35至48日龄每天摄入4升牛奶,50至59日龄每天摄入2升牛奶。所有犊牛从研究第3天开始直至74日龄都给予开食料。添加粗饲料的犊牛(每种喂奶方式n = 10)接受15%苜蓿干草与精细研磨的开食料混合而成的全混合日粮。所有犊牛在60日龄断奶,并在研究中持续至74日龄。无论喂奶方式如何,在断奶前、断奶后及整个期间,添加粗饲料的犊牛最终体重(92.54对83.14千克/天)、开食料摄入量(0.90对0.65千克/天)、总干物质摄入量(1.43对1.17千克/天)和平均日增重(0.73对0.60千克/天)均显著更高(P < 0.01)。喂奶方式对瘤胃pH值、总挥发性脂肪酸、乙酸或乙酸:丙酸比例以及体尺均无影响。在断奶前和断奶后期间,添加粗饲料的犊牛瘤胃pH值和乙酸的摩尔比例显著更高(P < 0.05)。无论是否提供粗饲料,STP方法均使断奶后单核细胞和淋巴细胞数量增加(P < 0.05)。总体而言,在体重、干物质摄入量、料重比、表观养分消化率(干物质、有机物和粗蛋白)和体尺方面,喂奶方式和粗饲料供应之间没有交互作用。喂奶方式和粗饲料供应的交互作用对研究第35天瘤胃中丁酸浓度有显著影响(P < 0.05),COV-NF处理的丁酸浓度最高。总之,无论喂奶方式如何,在开食料日粮中添加15%苜蓿干草均可提高奶牛犊牛的生长性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验