Carle Corinne F, James Andrew C, Kolic Maria, Essex Rohan W, Maddess Ted
John Curtin School of Medical Research The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
John Curtin School of Medical Research The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 2Department of Ophthalmology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6394-403. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16029.
This study investigated multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) stimuli that target the intrinsic photosensitivity of melanopsin retinal ganglion cells. The diagnostic potential for glaucoma is compared between stimuli biased toward either cone input to these cells or their melanopsin response.
Nineteen glaucoma patients and 24 normal subjects were tested using mfPOP stimulus protocols with either 33-ms yellow or 750-ms blue stimuli. Subjects' color discrimination was assessed using the Farnsworth 100-hue test. Pupillary responses were measured, and mixed-effects regression was used to quantify results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
The mean reduction in moderate to severe glaucoma pupil responses using blue mfPOP stimuli was larger but more variable than that of the shorter yellow stimuli (blue: -1.32 dB [t(40) = -2.29; P = 0.027]; yellow: -0.93 dB [t(40) = -3.13; P = 0.003]). Color discrimination decreased significantly with age and glaucoma, with type III blue-yellow anomalies dominating. ROC analysis revealed similar diagnostic accuracies (AUC for eyes classified as moderate to severe; blue: 81.7%, yellow: 83.7). Slightly higher sensitivity and specificity were obtained using blue stimuli in mild disease (AUCs blue: 71.1, cf. yellow: 67.7), although this difference was not significant.
In moderate to severe glaucoma, diagnostic accuracy of yellow and blue was similar, but blue stimuli showed limited ability to resolve scotomas. Blue mfPOP stimuli, however, may have advantages over yellow in detecting early glaucoma.
本研究调查了针对黑视蛋白视网膜神经节细胞内在光敏性的多焦点瞳孔客观视野检查(mfPOP)刺激。比较了偏向于这些细胞的视锥细胞输入或其黑视蛋白反应的刺激对青光眼的诊断潜力。
19名青光眼患者和24名正常受试者使用mfPOP刺激方案进行测试,刺激为33毫秒的黄色或750毫秒的蓝色刺激。使用法恩斯沃思100色调测试评估受试者的颜色辨别能力。测量瞳孔反应,并使用混合效应回归对结果进行量化。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断准确性。
使用蓝色mfPOP刺激时,中度至重度青光眼患者瞳孔反应的平均降低幅度更大,但比黄色短刺激的变异性更大(蓝色:-1.32 dB [t(40) = -2.29;P = 0.027];黄色:-0.93 dB [t(40) = -3.13;P = 0.003])。颜色辨别能力随年龄和青光眼显著下降,以III型蓝黄异常为主。ROC分析显示诊断准确性相似(分类为中度至重度的眼睛的AUC;蓝色:81.7%,黄色:83.7%)。在轻度疾病中,使用蓝色刺激获得的敏感性和特异性略高(AUCs蓝色:71.1,黄色:67.7),尽管这种差异不显著。
在中度至重度青光眼中,黄色和蓝色的诊断准确性相似,但蓝色刺激分辨暗点的能力有限。然而,蓝色mfPOP刺激在检测早期青光眼中可能比黄色更具优势。