Yang Kun, Wang Wei, Zhang Wei-Han, Chen Xiao-Long, Zhou Jing, Chen Xin-Zu, Zhang Bo, Chen Zhi-Xin, Zhou Zong-Guang, Hu Jian-Kun
From the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (KY, WW, W-HZ, X-LC, X-ZC, BZ, Z-XC, Z-GZ, J-KH); Laboratory of Gastric cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy (KY, WW, W-HZ, X-LC, X-ZC, J-KH); and Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (JZ).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1564. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001564.
Intestinal necrosis is a life-threatening disease, and its prompt and accurate diagnosis is very important. This study aimed to evaluate the value of D-dimer as a marker for early diagnosis of bowel necrosis. From 2009 to 2013, patients undergoing operation due to acute intestinal obstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared among no ischemia group, reversible ischemia group, and bowel necrosis group. There were totally 274 patients being included for analyses. Patients with bowel necrosis had a significant highest level of D-dimer compared with other 2 groups (P = .007) when FEU unit was applied. The optimal cutoff value of D-dimer levels as an indicator in diagnosing bowel necrosis was projected to be 1.965 mg/L, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.0%, a specificity of 45.6%, a positive predictive value of 60.7%, and a negative predictive value of 74.0%. And the sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 70.0% were detected, when 1.65 mg/L of D-dimer was set as the cutoff value to distinguish the reversible ischemia and bowel necrosis. The corresponding results in patients with no or slight peritoneal irritation signs were 85.2%, 44.7%, 35.4% and 89.5% respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 96.0% and 91.7%, respectively, when D-dimer and peritoneal irritation signs were combined to perform the parallel analysis. The combination of D-dimer and peritoneal irritation signs could generate a reliable negative predictive value, which is helpful to exclude the diagnosis of intestinal necrosis. However, it should also be proved in well-designed large-scale prospective study.
肠坏死是一种危及生命的疾病,其及时准确的诊断非常重要。本研究旨在评估D - 二聚体作为肠坏死早期诊断标志物的价值。回顾性分析了2009年至2013年因急性肠梗阻接受手术的患者。比较了无缺血组、可逆性缺血组和肠坏死组的临床病理特征。共有274例患者纳入分析。当采用FEU单位时,肠坏死患者的D - 二聚体水平显著高于其他两组(P = 0.007)。预测D - 二聚体水平作为诊断肠坏死指标的最佳临界值为1.965mg/L,其敏感性为84.0%,特异性为45.6%,阳性预测值为60.7%,阴性预测值为74.0%。当将D - 二聚体1.65mg/L设定为区分可逆性缺血和肠坏死的临界值时,检测到敏感性为84.0%,特异性为70.0%。无或轻度腹膜刺激征患者的相应结果分别为85.2%、44.7%、35.4%和89.5%。当D - 二聚体和腹膜刺激征联合进行平行分析时,敏感性和阴性预测值分别为96.0%和91.7%。D - 二聚体和腹膜刺激征的联合可产生可靠的阴性预测值,有助于排除肠坏死的诊断。然而,这也应在设计良好的大规模前瞻性研究中得到证实。